pogmnews

I would like everyone to check out this post that Susan (Ted) claims I
used antichristian tactics in...

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...com%26rnum%3D6

Notice how all I said was ,.. "You need to lighten up Ted. Jesus does
not approve of this method of "evangelization.""

Then read the post of Ted (Susan) before I said that statement. Ted
was using name calling and hateful words to try and convince Cindy she
was in error. All I was doing was tellign Ted he needed to use a more
loving approach. He truly needed to "lighten up." It was then he
ATTACKED me for rebuking his evil methods. Also notice later in that
thread that Ted himself admitted I sent him a PRIVATE email. I did
that because he wa sbeing too mean to Cindy in the threds. Cinday was
havign a problem, but Ted was makign it worse by his attack. I told
him in the email to be more Christlike to her so as to help her. But..
he refused. I was left with no other alternative but to "gently"
rebuke him in the open (See 1Tim 5:20 for jurisprudence) After I did
that Ted went literally berserk!

It makes no different if Ted (Susan) or Joe Shmoe was correct in
exposing Cindy or any other person. If someone is in sin you do NOT
use hatefilled comments, name calling and TRUE Antichristian tactics
to try and bring them back to Christ. The Word confirms this!!!

Proverbs 18:19, "A brother offended is harder to be won than a strong
city: and their contentions are like the bars of a castle."

What Susan (Ted) is doing now, and has always done, is share sheer
HATRED for those he/she thinks is against him/her. THAT is
antichristian to the core. Susan (Ted) is doing all he/she can to draw
people away from Christ now. The Word is plain on this. If Susan (Ted)
was correct in his/her message, no one will ever be blessed by it
because the WAY he/she shares the message. It truly causes people to
BUILD UP A WALL against him/her when such hatred is displayed.

PLUS.. notice this..

Notice the "style" Ted used back then.

Notice the way he worded sentences.

Notice the type of name calling he would use.

Notice the StRaNgE confused comments that always lead back to his
obsessed topic.

Notice the types of names Ted used, like "Vatican Cindy, or Super
terrorist, or Antichrist, or Jesuit."

Notice how Ted would used a hashmark "#" in front of all his post
titles.

Notice Ted's obsessive methods as well.

Notice how Ted would keep the same lie running for literally hundreds
of threads.

Notice how Ted would butt into other people's threads with his
obsessed agenda to try and move that thread to his worn out topic.

And notice when they ignored his attempts to steer their thread to his
agenda, he would tag THEM antichrists because they wouldn't jump on
his bandwagon.

Now... look at all of Susan's posts. Absolutely every single aspect of
Ted McMillian's methods are being used by Susan Miller. ABSOLUTELY
EVERY TACTIC!

Nuff said?

It's THAT easy folks!

Ted McMillian is in fact SUSAN MILLER!

....Nicholas
www.RemnantofGod.org

teresita

In article <f69efb90.0312010558.5636c707@posting.google.com>, NicholasII says...

OK, thank you. Those of us who have been here all along saw the transformation
and we already knew that.

--
Encyclopedia Teresita
http://web.newsguy.com/teresita

andrew

I think what you meant to say was, *Susan Williams is in fact Ted McMillan.*

Yes, it didn't take long to figure that out. Here is some more information on the
fellow which someone posted giving his date of birth and address. So now we
can remember her/his birthday and send her/him something nice. Born: 5/3/1959.

Send flowers May 3rd to, "Susan Williams" % :

Ted McMillan
10835 SW 112th Avenue, #300
Miami, FL 33176


http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com

teresita

In article <bqfnnr$2220fo$1@ID-97599.news.uni-berlin.de>, Andrew says...


The Jesuits already have that location in their computer, they are just waiting
for the command from the Vatican to make all flamethrowers "Red and Free"

--
Encyclopedia Teresita
http://web.newsguy.com/teresita

susan williams

Go to the link and look at the post which this man is, again in the
keeping of the Jesuit Oath, claiming is not insulting and wasn't made
to be so:

Antichrist Nick is now again using his evangelizaton techniques he
told us about. He told us we must not accuse, attack nor condemn, but
we must teach Christ. Although being called incessantly insane by
Antichrist Nick and being accused of obsessions, let's watch the
Jesuit unbelievably prove that he is right. He will then lodge a
complaint, BUT TO WHOM?:

On 1 Dec 2003 05:58:15 -0800, pogmnews@remnantofgod.org (NicholasII) wrote:


Now here is a confirmation of his attack on email. SHOW ME where
Brother Ted ever attacked him! We are showing where first blood was
DRAWN:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=ob...ver.com&rnum=1

From: Nicholas II (nicholas@localline2.com)
Subject: Re: #NICHOLAS ACCUSES ME OF SENDINIG HATE POSTS!
View: Complete Thread (23 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2002-03-27 20:12:54 PST
"Ted McMillan" <tmac1238@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message news:c9dac66d.0203271459.2c640178@posting.google.c om...

I had no idea you posted this on March 21 Ted. I rarely scan other
posts, especially their threads.

First off, I shared my thoughts about your obvious hate filled posts
towards Cindy in private email Ted. I didn't want to make you look bad
in front of everyone in the NG because I believe you have a calling
from on High to expose the evils of Rome. Being a "Roman NG" I didn't
want to harm you or your message in any way. Secondly, when you
persisted in slamming Cindy as well as other people in the NG
regardless if their Catholic or not, I tried my best to ignore you.
However, a few days ago I had to make a public stand against your
tactics because you seem to be getting a bit out of hand. I believe
you recall the post I put forth that merely said, "You need to lighten
up" Ted. After that post I was hoping you would realize how bad things
are getting. I hoped you would realize that it must be getting very
bad if a fellow believer in the Truth was reprimanding you in public
for it, even as gentle as that reprimand was. However, I see now you
ignored that warning as well, and have now placed me within your
sites. No-matter, I have been the target of ridicule from day one. I'm
used to it.


--
....Nicholas
www.remnantofgod.org
www.localline2.com/~nicholas
www.linearg.com/remnantofgod/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

He intentionally put the word OBVIOUS there, knowing that Brother Ted\0
frequently documented the habits of the Jesuits being despots:
claiming we must all have the right to disagree and then making final
and empirical statements as he has about what's in Brother Ted's
heart.

Antichrist Nick is lying here and is a very bold Jesuit. LOOK AT THE
THREAD AND YOU WILL SEE THAT BROTHER TED HAS NOT ATTACKED ANTICHRIST
NICK THERE!! Nick is counting on you being lazy. He is using the BIG
LIE technique. Who would think that a man with Nicholas's reputation
would boldly lie like that? Think what I say is not true? Look at
the thread and come back and even paste where Brother Ted has attacked
Antichrist Nick.

Very bold Jesuit!

Here now, after showing the only first attack, Brother Ted responds to
show the identical behavior of Nick with the other Jesuits. Here now
is Jesuit Nick acting like the rest of the Jesuits. After attacking
out of the air, he now has to accuse his victim of attacking:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=ob...ver.com&rnum=2

WHY has Ted McMillan suddenly come against me? Nicholas II a one time
FRIEND of Ted McMillan? He was attacking a woman on this NG named
Cindy simply because she noticed the way he was slamming a man named
Ted Seeber with a VERY hateful slam. Ted McMillan was using extreme
hatred instead of the grace and peace of Jesus to expose the LIES of
Ted Seeber. Cindy made mention of that to him. She suggested that he
tone down his hatred so as to possibly help Seeber stop his evil ways.
McMillan got VERY angry with her for correcting him and attacked her
openly. What I believe really happened was the demon IN Ted McMillan
got very angry with the Truth Cindy shared. Ted McMillan loves to
spew hate, and when Cindy made it appearent he was in sin, he got mad!
So I sent Ted McMillan a PRIVATE email hoping to make him aware that
another Christian was aware of his evil behaviour and he should
"lighten up" a bit. I thought that Ted McMillan would open his eyes
because he laways "said" he respected me and the message I was called
to preach. So I decided to help who I truly thought was a brother in
danger. Sadly, he
ignored me and continued to attack Cindy. So I posted "lighten up" to
Ted McMillan in public in the NG hoping he would see that I "Nicholas
II" a KNOWN preacher of Truth and a man He "supposedly" respected and
wanted to have as a friend was aware of his evil attittude. In fact if
you look back in the NG's you will see that Ted McMillan and I had a
great relationship.

In fact we both had some of the same data on each others site. i
"used" to have him linked on my site, and he used to have me linked on
his. But when I publically tried to rebuke his bad behaviour in the
hopes it would help him, Ted McMillan literally went berserk. Since
then he has attacked ME for that simple "lighten up" comment. That is
the ONLY reason he hates me folks. I corrected him, and like King Saul
instead of repenting he is now pointing fingers elsewhere to try and
transfer the blame.

ALL his lies about me are fabricated and 100% false. He had to LIE
because he knew I was not in the wrong, nor could he find anything on
my site in error, nor could he find anything in my posts in error. So
he started to fabricate lies instead. THAT is "false witnessing" and
that is obvious and open blun SIN. He got his "PRIDE" hurt is all, and
he has allowed Satan to grab hold of that foothold and drag him all
the way down to the level of CATHOLIC. He also tried to generate a
battle between him and myself so as to make it appear the TRUE Church
of Christ cannot be in one accord. A few "rancid pedophile defenders"
picked up on Ted McMillan's agenda and started to run with it JUST AS
I WARNED THEY WOULD months BEFORE Ted McMillan did it. But I ignored
Ted McMillan's attempts. THEN when he saw I was blowing him off as the
swine he has now become, he decided to HELP TED SEEBER instead. And
that is what he is doing now. And I must say WOW! Has he gone
overboard on this guy or what? He reminds me of a few Catholics that
have gone overboard trying to slam me. One wrote a book that he shares
with his
seminary students. (He's a proffessor) The other two have actually
built website slmming my ministry. Hit researching has shown they
have HEKPED me in a major way in generating hits to my site.

And now we see Ted McMillan doing the same thing for Ted Seeber.
Seeber my not have a website, but he does have a message straight from
hell. And Ted McMillan is now openly HELPING him spread it.

Ted McMillan is NOT a Christian, He is NOT an Adventist. He appears to
BE a Catholic though. And since I made that fact PUBLIC lately, he has
gotten even hotter.

Oh well... If the mitre fits?

[Our Comment: As we can see here he claims we must not accuse, but he
can exempt himself. He continues:]


QUESTION: Who was the first one who came out with attacks,
accusations and despot postings? Antichrist Nick began telling
Brother Ted what he was without debate. Somebody drew first blood!

Antichrist Nick is rambling on here without proof! HE DID NOT SHOW
THE SECOND POSTING THAT REVEALED HIS SECOND ATTACK!

DEAR ANTICHRIST NICK..

How much worse did Brother Ted make Cindy WHEN SHE HAS NOW APOLOGIZED
FOR WHAT SHE HAS DONE AND HAS CONFESSED BLINDNESS!! She constantly
told Brother Ted, like you Jesuits, that because he was upset by
posters constantly telling everyone non-Catholics must die, that the
Lord showed her he had a problem with love.

We don't listen to damned despot Jesuits, Antichrist Nick. How do you
know that our rebukes are hatred and your accusations, attacks,
preaching against making attacks and despot assumptions are not? Even
your intentional ignoring the death decree against all non-Catholics??

YOU MEAN WE DON'T DO WHAT YOU HAVE DONE??

Alright Antichrist Jesuit Nick...

Comment on these hatefilled words, please, Jesuit...

Antichrist Nick, and Antichrist Andrew:

" Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the
damnation of hell?"

Can you please explain this and no longer act like a Jesuit and evade
this? It is in the lying issue you have raised.

YOU HAVE WON ME!!!

WE DON'T LISTEN TO SUPER-DAMNED JESUITS WHO TEACH US HOW TO EVANGELIZE
AND THEN BREAK THOSE PRINCIPLES!! Can't you Jesuits update your lies
and accusations?

If it is hatred, what is this principle where Antichrist Nicholas
cannot evangelize us like he said we must do and not attack us?


Accusation, accusation, preaching against accusation, telling us we
must evangelize. Constant obsession and complaining TO WHOM?


Like your word that we must not attack, but we must evangelize?

How are we blessed here with Nick's telling us we must evangelize and
not accuse or attack, but he does it anyway?

How come Cindy has apologize for her blindness, Antichrist Nick???

More complaints and accusations, TO WHOM? To his victims... YOU, whom
he thinks is STUPID...


Notice the style all the Jesuits used. Preaching against attacks,
then attacking, preaching for the right to disagree, then telling us
what we are beyond debate...


Notice the way all the Jesuits ignored plain questions and evidence we
gave them and came back with their accusations and mouth activity to
overcome that evidence. Notice their claims about obsession, and then
they obsessively post against us.


Notice that the Jesuits cannot notice the name-calling they use. That
includes Antichrist Andrew calling us demons and cyberdemoniac, etc.!

Notice how he knows we are confused when we bring the evidence, they
ignore it and then come with the despot accusations without proof and
all the preaching against making accusations.

Notice their claims about obsession. And where can we find that in
the bible? Notice how they then become obsessed with breaking all
their own rules like Antichrist Nick does.

Neither do we care about their obsession with who we are compared to
our concerns that all non-Catholics have been given death decrees!

We don't care what you think about our styles. Remember, we are
insane according to you, right? We are insane to you! We don't worry
even about issues with identities. We are not servants of the
Antichrist! We saw a death decree against all non-Catholics, fitting
for Antichrist Nick's webpage!


We are already noticing much attention from Antichrist Nick telling us
we must not accuse or attack but evangelize, BUT WE ARE NOT SEEING
THAT EVANGELISM RIGHT HERE!!

Notice how Antichrist Nick doesn't prove anything and doesn't feel
like he has to! Remember President Bush feels he doesn't have to
prove there are weapons of mass destruction? Remember his military
tribunals he has set up to ensure he doesn't have to prove any of his
charges? He then, in his inaugural address, called the founder of
Opus Dei a saint! The order that probably trained all of these Jesuits!

Show us from the bible this constant Jesuit charge about obsessions
and please show how neither you nor Antichrist Andrew have been
obsessed.

Antichrist Andrew told us posting frequently proves a person has had
severe childhood trauma and a dysfunctional home. Show us how
Antichrist Andrew has not posted frequently!

He voided all his principles to attack us as you have. Bad symptom of Jesuitism.


We have posted a clear death decree against all non-Catholics! Why
hasn't Antichrist Nick noticed this yet? Is there something else he is obsessed with?


Now, look at Antichrist Nick's tactics with his preaching on how we
must behave and his complete disregard to it. ABSOLUTELY EVERY TACTIC
LIKE THE JESUITS! Look on his preaching against being obsessed with
things. He is obsessed with who we are, we are concerned with the
death decree against all non-Catholics!


LONG TIME, but lacking in proof!

What has Antichrist Nick said then that the other Jesuits didn't say?

For the damned servants of the Antichrist, naturally!


Antichrist Nick's obsession against accusing must be added to show the
fact that HE IS A JESUIT!

NUFF SAID!!

In His Grace,


'Susan

susan williams

Go to the link and look at the post which this man is, again in the
keeping of the Jesuit Oath, claiming is not insulting and wasn't made
to be so:

Antichrist Nick is now again using his evangelizaton techniques he
told us about. He told us we must not accuse, attack nor condemn, but
we must teach Christ. Although being called incessantly insane by
Antichrist Nick and being accused of obsessions, let's watch the
Jesuit unbelievably prove that he is right. He will then lodge a
complaint, BUT TO WHOM?:

On 1 Dec 2003 05:58:15 -0800, pogmnews@remnantofgod.org (NicholasII) wrote:


Now here is a confirmation of his attack on email. SHOW ME where
Brother Ted ever attacked him! We are showing where first blood was
DRAWN:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=ob...ver.com&rnum=1

From: Nicholas II (nicholas@localline2.com)
Subject: Re: #NICHOLAS ACCUSES ME OF SENDINIG HATE POSTS!
View: Complete Thread (23 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2002-03-27 20:12:54 PST
"Ted McMillan" <tmac1238@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message news:c9dac66d.0203271459.2c640178@posting.google.c om...

I had no idea you posted this on March 21 Ted. I rarely scan other
posts, especially their threads.

First off, I shared my thoughts about your obvious hate filled posts
towards Cindy in private email Ted. I didn't want to make you look bad
in front of everyone in the NG because I believe you have a calling
from on High to expose the evils of Rome. Being a "Roman NG" I didn't
want to harm you or your message in any way. Secondly, when you
persisted in slamming Cindy as well as other people in the NG
regardless if their Catholic or not, I tried my best to ignore you.
However, a few days ago I had to make a public stand against your
tactics because you seem to be getting a bit out of hand. I believe
you recall the post I put forth that merely said, "You need to lighten
up" Ted. After that post I was hoping you would realize how bad things
are getting. I hoped you would realize that it must be getting very
bad if a fellow believer in the Truth was reprimanding you in public
for it, even as gentle as that reprimand was. However, I see now you
ignored that warning as well, and have now placed me within your
sites. No-matter, I have been the target of ridicule from day one. I'm
used to it.


--
....Nicholas
www.remnantofgod.org
www.localline2.com/~nicholas
www.linearg.com/remnantofgod/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

He intentionally put the word OBVIOUS there, knowing that Brother Ted\0
frequently documented the habits of the Jesuits being despots:
claiming we must all have the right to disagree and then making final
and empirical statements as he has about what's in Brother Ted's
heart.

Antichrist Nick is lying here and is a very bold Jesuit. LOOK AT THE
THREAD AND YOU WILL SEE THAT BROTHER TED HAS NOT ATTACKED ANTICHRIST
NICK THERE!! Nick is counting on you being lazy. He is using the BIG
LIE technique. Who would think that a man with Nicholas's reputation
would boldly lie like that? Think what I say is not true? Look at
the thread and come back and even paste where Brother Ted has attacked
Antichrist Nick.

Very bold Jesuit!

Here now, after showing the only first attack, Brother Ted responds to
show the identical behavior of Nick with the other Jesuits. Here now
is Jesuit Nick acting like the rest of the Jesuits. After attacking
out of the air, he now has to accuse his victim of attacking:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=ob...ver.com&rnum=2

WHY has Ted McMillan suddenly come against me? Nicholas II a one time
FRIEND of Ted McMillan? He was attacking a woman on this NG named
Cindy simply because she noticed the way he was slamming a man named
Ted Seeber with a VERY hateful slam. Ted McMillan was using extreme
hatred instead of the grace and peace of Jesus to expose the LIES of
Ted Seeber. Cindy made mention of that to him. She suggested that he
tone down his hatred so as to possibly help Seeber stop his evil ways.
McMillan got VERY angry with her for correcting him and attacked her
openly. What I believe really happened was the demon IN Ted McMillan
got very angry with the Truth Cindy shared. Ted McMillan loves to
spew hate, and when Cindy made it appearent he was in sin, he got mad!
So I sent Ted McMillan a PRIVATE email hoping to make him aware that
another Christian was aware of his evil behaviour and he should
"lighten up" a bit. I thought that Ted McMillan would open his eyes
because he laways "said" he respected me and the message I was called
to preach. So I decided to help who I truly thought was a brother in
danger. Sadly, he
ignored me and continued to attack Cindy. So I posted "lighten up" to
Ted McMillan in public in the NG hoping he would see that I "Nicholas
II" a KNOWN preacher of Truth and a man He "supposedly" respected and
wanted to have as a friend was aware of his evil attittude. In fact if
you look back in the NG's you will see that Ted McMillan and I had a
great relationship.

In fact we both had some of the same data on each others site. i
"used" to have him linked on my site, and he used to have me linked on
his. But when I publically tried to rebuke his bad behaviour in the
hopes it would help him, Ted McMillan literally went berserk. Since
then he has attacked ME for that simple "lighten up" comment. That is
the ONLY reason he hates me folks. I corrected him, and like King Saul
instead of repenting he is now pointing fingers elsewhere to try and
transfer the blame.

ALL his lies about me are fabricated and 100% false. He had to LIE
because he knew I was not in the wrong, nor could he find anything on
my site in error, nor could he find anything in my posts in error. So
he started to fabricate lies instead. THAT is "false witnessing" and
that is obvious and open blun SIN. He got his "PRIDE" hurt is all, and
he has allowed Satan to grab hold of that foothold and drag him all
the way down to the level of CATHOLIC. He also tried to generate a
battle between him and myself so as to make it appear the TRUE Church
of Christ cannot be in one accord. A few "rancid pedophile defenders"
picked up on Ted McMillan's agenda and started to run with it JUST AS
I WARNED THEY WOULD months BEFORE Ted McMillan did it. But I ignored
Ted McMillan's attempts. THEN when he saw I was blowing him off as the
swine he has now become, he decided to HELP TED SEEBER instead. And
that is what he is doing now. And I must say WOW! Has he gone
overboard on this guy or what? He reminds me of a few Catholics that
have gone overboard trying to slam me. One wrote a book that he shares
with his
seminary students. (He's a proffessor) The other two have actually
built website slmming my ministry. Hit researching has shown they
have HEKPED me in a major way in generating hits to my site.

And now we see Ted McMillan doing the same thing for Ted Seeber.
Seeber my not have a website, but he does have a message straight from
hell. And Ted McMillan is now openly HELPING him spread it.

Ted McMillan is NOT a Christian, He is NOT an Adventist. He appears to
BE a Catholic though. And since I made that fact PUBLIC lately, he has
gotten even hotter.

Oh well... If the mitre fits?

[Our Comment: As we can see here he claims we must not accuse, but he
can exempt himself. He continues:]


QUESTION: Who was the first one who came out with attacks,
accusations and despot postings? Antichrist Nick began telling
Brother Ted what he was without debate. Somebody drew first blood!

Antichrist Nick is rambling on here without proof! HE DID NOT SHOW
THE SECOND POSTING THAT REVEALED HIS SECOND ATTACK!

DEAR ANTICHRIST NICK..

How much worse did Brother Ted make Cindy WHEN SHE HAS NOW APOLOGIZED
FOR WHAT SHE HAS DONE AND HAS CONFESSED BLINDNESS!! She constantly
told Brother Ted, like you Jesuits, that because he was upset by
posters constantly telling everyone non-Catholics must die, that the
Lord showed her he had a problem with love.

We don't listen to damned despot Jesuits, Antichrist Nick. How do you
know that our rebukes are hatred and your accusations, attacks,
preaching against making attacks and despot assumptions are not? Even
your intentional ignoring the death decree against all non-Catholics??

YOU MEAN WE DON'T DO WHAT YOU HAVE DONE??

Alright Antichrist Jesuit Nick...

Comment on these hatefilled words, please, Jesuit...

Antichrist Nick, and Antichrist Andrew:

" Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the
damnation of hell?"

Can you please explain this and no longer act like a Jesuit and evade
this? It is in the lying issue you have raised.

YOU HAVE WON ME!!!

WE DON'T LISTEN TO SUPER-DAMNED JESUITS WHO TEACH US HOW TO EVANGELIZE
AND THEN BREAK THOSE PRINCIPLES!! Can't you Jesuits update your lies
and accusations?

If it is hatred, what is this principle where Antichrist Nicholas
cannot evangelize us like he said we must do and not attack us?


Accusation, accusation, preaching against accusation, telling us we
must evangelize. Constant obsession and complaining TO WHOM?


Like your word that we must not attack, but we must evangelize?

How are we blessed here with Nick's telling us we must evangelize and
not accuse or attack, but he does it anyway?

How come Cindy has apologize for her blindness, Antichrist Nick???

More complaints and accusations, TO WHOM? To his victims... YOU, whom
he thinks is STUPID...


Notice the style all the Jesuits used. Preaching against attacks,
then attacking, preaching for the right to disagree, then telling us
what we are beyond debate...


Notice the way all the Jesuits ignored plain questions and evidence we
gave them and came back with their accusations and mouth activity to
overcome that evidence. Notice their claims about obsession, and then
they obsessively post against us.


Notice that the Jesuits cannot notice the name-calling they use. That
includes Antichrist Andrew calling us demons and cyberdemoniac, etc.!

Notice how he knows we are confused when we bring the evidence, they
ignore it and then come with the despot accusations without proof and
all the preaching against making accusations.

Notice their claims about obsession. And where can we find that in
the bible? Notice how they then become obsessed with breaking all
their own rules like Antichrist Nick does.

Neither do we care about their obsession with who we are compared to
our concerns that all non-Catholics have been given death decrees!

We don't care what you think about our styles. Remember, we are
insane according to you, right? We are insane to you! We don't worry
even about issues with identities. We are not servants of the
Antichrist! We saw a death decree against all non-Catholics, fitting
for Antichrist Nick's webpage!


We are already noticing much attention from Antichrist Nick telling us
we must not accuse or attack but evangelize, BUT WE ARE NOT SEEING
THAT EVANGELISM RIGHT HERE!!

Notice how Antichrist Nick doesn't prove anything and doesn't feel
like he has to! Remember President Bush feels he doesn't have to
prove there are weapons of mass destruction? Remember his military
tribunals he has set up to ensure he doesn't have to prove any of his
charges? He then, in his inaugural address, called the founder of
Opus Dei a saint! The order that probably trained all of these Jesuits!

Show us from the bible this constant Jesuit charge about obsessions
and please show how neither you nor Antichrist Andrew have been
obsessed.

Antichrist Andrew told us posting frequently proves a person has had
severe childhood trauma and a dysfunctional home. Show us how
Antichrist Andrew has not posted frequently!

He voided all his principles to attack us as you have. Bad symptom of Jesuitism.


We have posted a clear death decree against all non-Catholics! Why
hasn't Antichrist Nick noticed this yet? Is there something else he is obsessed with?


Now, look at Antichrist Nick's tactics with his preaching on how we
must behave and his complete disregard to it. ABSOLUTELY EVERY TACTIC
LIKE THE JESUITS! Look on his preaching against being obsessed with
things. He is obsessed with who we are, we are concerned with the
death decree against all non-Catholics!


LONG TIME, but lacking in proof!

What has Antichrist Nick said then that the other Jesuits didn't say?

For the damned servants of the Antichrist, naturally!


Antichrist Nick's obsession against accusing must be added to show the
fact that HE IS A JESUIT!

NUFF SAID!!

In His Grace,


'Susan

susan williams

Why did you claim my posts torture you Terrorista when the other
servants of the Antichrist say I'm mentally insane?

Here is your death decree against all non-Catholics. Consistently to
date, only non-Catholics have been upset about it:

=========

A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when
with approval he told us that:

"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"

You can find that statement here as I submit the evidence:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com

Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks
when America was assessng what a terrorist was with respect to human
life.

Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave.
He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to
have disappeared from it.

Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done
to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how
Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has
mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To
accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free
media and teach people how they must understand that people will
disagree.

That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called
himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of
lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is
Constitutional!

He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent)
Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.

I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't
upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. As usual, the
super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the
Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!

Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned
all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even
those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that
Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for
Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this.
However, since we started this work, another person came out more
boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She
posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great
Christian work Foxe's Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of
uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the
work as:

"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." She therefore approved of their deaths
because they viewed religion differently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...rn.newsguy.com
1/14/2003

Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country.

Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called
Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only
referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003
who were a minority group of Christians during that time:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01pej%40drn.newsguy.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3424526807d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26 lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3Dbb521t01pej%2540drn.newsguy.com>

How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the\0
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:

Teresita belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses
when she condemned the Christian martyrs as "hereticks" by condemning
Tyndale, who was not one of the Albigenses:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com>

NEXT:

When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained
to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the
Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of
Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies.
Here she is freely admitting what all those "Anti-Catholics" and
"Catholic-haters" have been saying all along:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl270768597d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb5kmo0vt2%40drn.newsguy.com>

Here is that dialogue below:

From: Teresita (teresita@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly

Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs86mheig36vm8nec6s@4ax.com>, Susan says...


Teresita replies:
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:

Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."


ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT??

LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...rn.newsguy.com

After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly admitting is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, this is how she declared Rome didn't hate her victims
she was killing: I wrote:
In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l7dk45d4e25165n5ev@4ax.com>, Susan Williams says...


Teresita replies:
It's nothing personal. It's just business.

--
Encyclopedia Teresita

Now the man who was ready to pull out his hair telling us that Ted
Seeber didn't represent Rome when he condemned the lives of all
non-Catholics is nowhere to be found with Teresita boldly confirming
the same. Instead he attacks the Adventist Church as a dangerous
cult:
Super-terrorist William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
True Adventist are not like that. The problem is that demon-possessed
killers from the Antichrist such as William Suzanne have infiltrated
our church to the CORE. That is why when Ted Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics to persecution and death, Paul Tooley came in to lie
claimng that he didn't do that, and then attacked me for exposing him.
They are trying to tell us that is standard behavior for Adventiss and
that I am not one.

Antichrist Andrew then attacked, claiming that by Brother Ted
frequently posting, he has childhood trauma and a dysfunctional home.
All of these said not the slightest word against the man who condemned
them to death.

COMPARE THE ISSUES THE SUPER-TERRORIST IS BRINGING AGAINST THE
ADVENTIST CHURCH WITH WHAT I'M SHIOWING YOU AND SEE WHAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD! William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
Will Adventists tell you that you must protect a man who has condemned
the lives of all non-Catholics? Will they then tell you that a person
who exposes such a person is hateful and Satans child as William
Suzanne, Lamarr Edwards, "Adventist" Paul Tooley and "Adventist"
Andrew have done?

COMPARE THE ISSUES THE SUPER-TERRORIST IS BRINGING AGAINST THE
ADVENTIST CHURCH WITH WHAT I'M SHIOWING YOU AND SEE WHAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD! William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
I would tell anyone that. But do you know folks that the major reasn
Rome has shed more blood than any institution on earth was because all
those centuries of the Christian era SHE HAS BEEN SAYING THAT SHE WAS
THE ONLY TRUE CHURCH?? Do you know that she recently published a
public document REAFFIRMING THIS??

Now the man is telling us the Adventist Church is trying to hide the
claim. Rome doesn't hide the claim. Would something smell bad if the
Evangelical community accepts Rome anyway even though her claims to be
the true church always invovles the shedding of much blood to those
who disagree?

Watch the demon work: William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
Now listen to what the Protestants used to say BEFORE, so that we can
figure out if something has taken possession of them:

"But even with such a great cloud of witnesses, one might be tempted
to ask the following question, 'Has not Rome changed recently?' To
answer this most vital question, I turn once again to the message of
D. Martyn Lloyd Jones:

'Ah, but,' you say, 'has not the Roman Catholic Church changed? You
are simply looking back, you are speaking as if you lived in the 16th
century - don't you realize you are living in the 20th century?

My answer is quite simple. The proudest boast of the Roman Catholic
Church is this, that she never changes, Semper eadem. How can she
change? If she changes she will be admitting that she was wrong in the
past - but she was saying then that she was infallible, and that the
Pope is the Vicar of Christ and that he cannot make a mistake. If she
says that she is capable of change she is denying her central claim!
She does not say that she is changing, and she never will. The Church
of Rome remains the same.

If anything, she is even worse. She has 'added' things to what she
taught in the 16th century, such as Papal infallibility, etc. No,
there is no change in the Church of Rome. And if there ever is one
great world Church, it will be because the Church of Rome has absorbed
all the rest and swallowed them in ignorance!'
============= William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
What the super-terrorists won't tell you AND WHAT THEY HAVE NOT
RETRACTED! COMPARE THE "CRIMES!":

"If Catholics ever gain a sufficient numerical majority in this
country, religious freedom is at an end. So our enemies say, SO WE
BELIEVE" (The Shepherd of the Valley, official journal of the Bishop
of St Louis, Nov. 23, 1851).

William Suzanne claiming to quote Adventist sources:

Susan Williams:
"No man has a right to choose his religion." -- (New York Freeman,
official journal of Bishops Hughes, Jan. 26, 1852). William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
"The church . . . does not, and cannot accept, or in any degree favor,
liberty in the Protestant sense of liberty." -- (Catholic World,
April, 1870.)

"Protestantism has not, and never can have, any right where
Catholicity has triumphed." -- (Catholic Review, June, 1875) William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
"Religious Liberty is merely endured UNTIL THE OPPOSITE CAN BE CARRIED
INTO EFFECT WITHOUT PERIL TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH." -- (Rt. Rev.
O'Connor, Bishop of Pittsburgh.)

"The absurd and erroneous doctrines or ravings in defense of liberty
of conscience are a most pestilential error--a pest, of all others,
most to be dreaded in a state." -- Encyclical Letter of Pope Pius IX,
August 15, 1854.

"There is, ere long, to be a state religion in this country, and that
state religion is to be the Roman Catholic. . . The Roman Catholic is
to wield his vote for the purpose of securing Catholic ascendancy in
this country." -- (Father Hecker, Catholic World, July, 1870.)

"If the liberties of the American people are ever destroyed, they will
fall by the hands of the Catholic clergy." -- Lafayette

"You ask if the Pope were lord over this land and you were in a
minority, what he would do to you? That, we say, would entirely depend
on circumstances. If it would benefit the cause of Catholicism, he
would tolerate you: if expedient, he would imprison, banish you,
probably he might even hang you. But be assured of one thing, he would
never tolerate you for the sake of your glorious principles of Civil
and religious liberty." -- (Rambler, one of the most prominent
Catholic papers of England, Sept., 1851.)


WHICH WOULD YOU WANT IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD!

How about William Suzanne telling us that ELLEN WHITE, dead for almost
100 years, IS THE ANTICHRIST!! When Christ comes, He will smell like
a rose just ressurrecting Ellen White to punish her for destroying the
earth!!

In His Grace,

Susan Williams

susan williams

We already said WE BELIEVE YOU!!

Here is your death decree against all non-Catholics:

===========

A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when
with approval he told us that:

"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"

You can find that statement here as I submit the evidence:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com

Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks
when America was assessng what a terrorist was with respect to human
life.

Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave.
He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to
have disappeared from it.

Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done
to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how
Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has
mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To
accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free
media and teach people how they must understand that people will
disagree.

That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called
himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of
lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is
Constitutional!

He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent)
Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.

I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't
upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. As usual, the
super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the
Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!

Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned
all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even
those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that
Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for
Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this.
However, since we started this work, another person came out more
boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She
posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great
Christian work Foxe's Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of
uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the
work as:

"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." She therefore approved of their deaths
because they viewed religion differently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...rn.newsguy.com
1/14/2003

Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country.

Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called
Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only
referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003
who were a minority group of Christians during that time:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01pej%40drn.newsguy.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3424526807d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26 lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3Dbb521t01pej%2540drn.newsguy.com>

How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the\0
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:

Teresita belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses
when she condemned the Christian martyrs as "hereticks" by condemning
Tyndale, who was not one of the Albigenses:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com>

NEXT:

When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained
to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the
Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of
Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies.
Here she is freely admitting what all those "Anti-Catholics" and
"Catholic-haters" have been saying all along:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl270768597d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb5kmo0vt2%40drn.newsguy.com>

Here is that dialogue below:

From: Teresita (teresita@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly

Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs86mheig36vm8nec6s@4ax.com>, Susan says...


Teresita replies:
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:

Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."


ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT??

LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...rn.newsguy.com

After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly admitting is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, this is how she declared Rome didn't hate her victims
she was killing: I wrote:
In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l7dk45d4e25165n5ev@4ax.com>, Susan Williams says...


Teresita replies:
It's nothing personal. It's just business.

--
Encyclopedia Teresita

Now the man who was ready to pull out his hair telling us that Ted
Seeber didn't represent Rome when he condemned the lives of all
non-Catholics is nowhere to be found with Teresita boldly confirming
the same. Instead he attacks the Adventist Church as a dangerous
cult:
Super-terrorist William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
True Adventist are not like that. The problem is that demon-possessed
killers from the Antichrist such as William Suzanne have infiltrated
our church to the CORE. That is why when Ted Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics to persecution and death, Paul Tooley came in to lie
claimng that he didn't do that, and then attacked me for exposing him.
They are trying to tell us that is standard behavior for Adventiss and
that I am not one.

Antichrist Andrew then attacked, claiming that by Brother Ted
frequently posting, he has childhood trauma and a dysfunctional home.
All of these said not the slightest word against the man who condemned
them to death.

COMPARE THE ISSUES THE SUPER-TERRORIST IS BRINGING AGAINST THE
ADVENTIST CHURCH WITH WHAT I'M SHIOWING YOU AND SEE WHAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD! William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
Will Adventists tell you that you must protect a man who has condemned
the lives of all non-Catholics? Will they then tell you that a person
who exposes such a person is hateful and Satans child as William
Suzanne, Lamarr Edwards, "Adventist" Paul Tooley and "Adventist"
Andrew have done?

COMPARE THE ISSUES THE SUPER-TERRORIST IS BRINGING AGAINST THE
ADVENTIST CHURCH WITH WHAT I'M SHIOWING YOU AND SEE WHAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD! William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
I would tell anyone that. But do you know folks that the major reasn
Rome has shed more blood than any institution on earth was because all
those centuries of the Christian era SHE HAS BEEN SAYING THAT SHE WAS
THE ONLY TRUE CHURCH?? Do you know that she recently published a
public document REAFFIRMING THIS??

Now the man is telling us the Adventist Church is trying to hide the
claim. Rome doesn't hide the claim. Would something smell bad if the
Evangelical community accepts Rome anyway even though her claims to be
the true church always invovles the shedding of much blood to those
who disagree?

Watch the demon work: William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
Now listen to what the Protestants used to say BEFORE, so that we can
figure out if something has taken possession of them:

"But even with such a great cloud of witnesses, one might be tempted
to ask the following question, 'Has not Rome changed recently?' To
answer this most vital question, I turn once again to the message of
D. Martyn Lloyd Jones:

'Ah, but,' you say, 'has not the Roman Catholic Church changed? You
are simply looking back, you are speaking as if you lived in the 16th
century - don't you realize you are living in the 20th century?

My answer is quite simple. The proudest boast of the Roman Catholic
Church is this, that she never changes, Semper eadem. How can she
change? If she changes she will be admitting that she was wrong in the
past - but she was saying then that she was infallible, and that the
Pope is the Vicar of Christ and that he cannot make a mistake. If she
says that she is capable of change she is denying her central claim!
She does not say that she is changing, and she never will. The Church
of Rome remains the same.

If anything, she is even worse. She has 'added' things to what she
taught in the 16th century, such as Papal infallibility, etc. No,
there is no change in the Church of Rome. And if there ever is one
great world Church, it will be because the Church of Rome has absorbed
all the rest and swallowed them in ignorance!'
============= William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
What the super-terrorists won't tell you AND WHAT THEY HAVE NOT
RETRACTED! COMPARE THE "CRIMES!":

"If Catholics ever gain a sufficient numerical majority in this
country, religious freedom is at an end. So our enemies say, SO WE
BELIEVE" (The Shepherd of the Valley, official journal of the Bishop
of St Louis, Nov. 23, 1851).

William Suzanne claiming to quote Adventist sources:

Susan Williams:
"No man has a right to choose his religion." -- (New York Freeman,
official journal of Bishops Hughes, Jan. 26, 1852). William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
"The church . . . does not, and cannot accept, or in any degree favor,
liberty in the Protestant sense of liberty." -- (Catholic World,
April, 1870.)

"Protestantism has not, and never can have, any right where
Catholicity has triumphed." -- (Catholic Review, June, 1875) William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
"Religious Liberty is merely endured UNTIL THE OPPOSITE CAN BE CARRIED
INTO EFFECT WITHOUT PERIL TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH." -- (Rt. Rev.
O'Connor, Bishop of Pittsburgh.)

"The absurd and erroneous doctrines or ravings in defense of liberty
of conscience are a most pestilential error--a pest, of all others,
most to be dreaded in a state." -- Encyclical Letter of Pope Pius IX,
August 15, 1854.

"There is, ere long, to be a state religion in this country, and that
state religion is to be the Roman Catholic. . . The Roman Catholic is
to wield his vote for the purpose of securing Catholic ascendancy in
this country." -- (Father Hecker, Catholic World, July, 1870.)

"If the liberties of the American people are ever destroyed, they will
fall by the hands of the Catholic clergy." -- Lafayette

"You ask if the Pope were lord over this land and you were in a
minority, what he would do to you? That, we say, would entirely depend
on circumstances. If it would benefit the cause of Catholicism, he
would tolerate you: if expedient, he would imprison, banish you,
probably he might even hang you. But be assured of one thing, he would
never tolerate you for the sake of your glorious principles of Civil
and religious liberty." -- (Rambler, one of the most prominent
Catholic papers of England, Sept., 1851.)


WHICH WOULD YOU WANT IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD!

How about William Suzanne telling us that ELLEN WHITE, dead for almost
100 years, IS THE ANTICHRIST!! When Christ comes, He will smell like
a rose just ressurrecting Ellen White to punish her for destroying the
earth!!

In His Grace,

Susan Williams

teresita

In article <i61nsvkknneefjdbpftrnqom97iv2gd3qq@4ax.com>, Susan Williams says...


Because reading posts that are inane because the author is insane in the brain
from cocaine is a pain.

--
Encyclopedia Teresita
http://web.newsguy.com/teresita

susan williams

And yet you keep reading them! From Vatican Standards, with Nick,
Andrew and the rest, that's smart!! I'm insane you say, and yet I can
recognize that is smart!

Here is your death decree against all non-Catholics. Nicholas HAS TO
ignore this:

==============

A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when
with approval he told us that:

"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"

You can find that statement here as I submit the evidence:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com

Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks
when America was assessng what a terrorist was with respect to human
life.

Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave.
He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to
have disappeared from it.

Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done
to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how
Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has
mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To
accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free
media and teach people how they must understand that people will
disagree.

That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called
himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of
lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is
Constitutional!

He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent)
Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.

I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't
upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. As usual, the
super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the
Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!

Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned
all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even
those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that
Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for
Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this.
However, since we started this work, another person came out more
boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She
posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great
Christian work Foxe's Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of
uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the
work as:

"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." She therefore approved of their deaths
because they viewed religion differently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...rn.newsguy.com
1/14/2003

Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country.

Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called
Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only
referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003\0
who were a minority group of Christians during that time:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01pej%40drn.newsguy.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3424526807d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26 lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3Dbb521t01pej%2540drn.newsguy.com>

How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:

Teresita belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses
when she condemned the Christian martyrs as "hereticks" by condemning
Tyndale, who was not one of the Albigenses:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com>

NEXT:

When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained
to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the
Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of
Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies.
Here she is freely admitting what all those "Anti-Catholics" and
"Catholic-haters" have been saying all along:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl270768597d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb5kmo0vt2%40drn.newsguy.com>

Here is that dialogue below:

From: Teresita (teresita@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly

Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs86mheig36vm8nec6s@4ax.com>, Susan says...


Teresita replies:
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:

Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."


ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT??

LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...rn.newsguy.com

After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly admitting is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, this is how she declared Rome didn't hate her victims
she was killing: I wrote:
In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l7dk45d4e25165n5ev@4ax.com>, Susan Williams says...


Teresita replies:
It's nothing personal. It's just business.

--
Encyclopedia Teresita

Now the man who was ready to pull out his hair telling us that Ted
Seeber didn't represent Rome when he condemned the lives of all
non-Catholics is nowhere to be found with Teresita boldly confirming
the same. Instead he attacks the Adventist Church as a dangerous
cult:
Super-terrorist William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
True Adventist are not like that. The problem is that demon-possessed
killers from the Antichrist such as William Suzanne have infiltrated
our church to the CORE. That is why when Ted Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics to persecution and death, Paul Tooley came in to lie
claimng that he didn't do that, and then attacked me for exposing him.
They are trying to tell us that is standard behavior for Adventiss and
that I am not one.

Antichrist Andrew then attacked, claiming that by Brother Ted
frequently posting, he has childhood trauma and a dysfunctional home.
All of these said not the slightest word against the man who condemned
them to death.

COMPARE THE ISSUES THE SUPER-TERRORIST IS BRINGING AGAINST THE
ADVENTIST CHURCH WITH WHAT I'M SHIOWING YOU AND SEE WHAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD! William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
Will Adventists tell you that you must protect a man who has condemned
the lives of all non-Catholics? Will they then tell you that a person
who exposes such a person is hateful and Satans child as William
Suzanne, Lamarr Edwards, "Adventist" Paul Tooley and "Adventist"
Andrew have done?

COMPARE THE ISSUES THE SUPER-TERRORIST IS BRINGING AGAINST THE
ADVENTIST CHURCH WITH WHAT I'M SHIOWING YOU AND SEE WHAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD! William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
I would tell anyone that. But do you know folks that the major reasn
Rome has shed more blood than any institution on earth was because all
those centuries of the Christian era SHE HAS BEEN SAYING THAT SHE WAS
THE ONLY TRUE CHURCH?? Do you know that she recently published a
public document REAFFIRMING THIS??

Now the man is telling us the Adventist Church is trying to hide the
claim. Rome doesn't hide the claim. Would something smell bad if the
Evangelical community accepts Rome anyway even though her claims to be
the true church always invovles the shedding of much blood to those
who disagree?

Watch the demon work: William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
Now listen to what the Protestants used to say BEFORE, so that we can
figure out if something has taken possession of them:

"But even with such a great cloud of witnesses, one might be tempted
to ask the following question, 'Has not Rome changed recently?' To
answer this most vital question, I turn once again to the message of
D. Martyn Lloyd Jones:

'Ah, but,' you say, 'has not the Roman Catholic Church changed? You
are simply looking back, you are speaking as if you lived in the 16th
century - don't you realize you are living in the 20th century?

My answer is quite simple. The proudest boast of the Roman Catholic
Church is this, that she never changes, Semper eadem. How can she
change? If she changes she will be admitting that she was wrong in the
past - but she was saying then that she was infallible, and that the
Pope is the Vicar of Christ and that he cannot make a mistake. If she
says that she is capable of change she is denying her central claim!
She does not say that she is changing, and she never will. The Church
of Rome remains the same.

If anything, she is even worse. She has 'added' things to what she
taught in the 16th century, such as Papal infallibility, etc. No,
there is no change in the Church of Rome. And if there ever is one
great world Church, it will be because the Church of Rome has absorbed
all the rest and swallowed them in ignorance!'
============= William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
What the super-terrorists won't tell you AND WHAT THEY HAVE NOT
RETRACTED! COMPARE THE "CRIMES!":

"If Catholics ever gain a sufficient numerical majority in this
country, religious freedom is at an end. So our enemies say, SO WE
BELIEVE" (The Shepherd of the Valley, official journal of the Bishop
of St Louis, Nov. 23, 1851).

William Suzanne claiming to quote Adventist sources:

Susan Williams:
"No man has a right to choose his religion." -- (New York Freeman,
official journal of Bishops Hughes, Jan. 26, 1852). William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
"The church . . . does not, and cannot accept, or in any degree favor,
liberty in the Protestant sense of liberty." -- (Catholic World,
April, 1870.)

"Protestantism has not, and never can have, any right where
Catholicity has triumphed." -- (Catholic Review, June, 1875) William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
"Religious Liberty is merely endured UNTIL THE OPPOSITE CAN BE CARRIED
INTO EFFECT WITHOUT PERIL TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH." -- (Rt. Rev.
O'Connor, Bishop of Pittsburgh.)

"The absurd and erroneous doctrines or ravings in defense of liberty
of conscience are a most pestilential error--a pest, of all others,
most to be dreaded in a state." -- Encyclical Letter of Pope Pius IX,
August 15, 1854.

"There is, ere long, to be a state religion in this country, and that
state religion is to be the Roman Catholic. . . The Roman Catholic is
to wield his vote for the purpose of securing Catholic ascendancy in
this country." -- (Father Hecker, Catholic World, July, 1870.)

"If the liberties of the American people are ever destroyed, they will
fall by the hands of the Catholic clergy." -- Lafayette

"You ask if the Pope were lord over this land and you were in a
minority, what he would do to you? That, we say, would entirely depend
on circumstances. If it would benefit the cause of Catholicism, he
would tolerate you: if expedient, he would imprison, banish you,
probably he might even hang you. But be assured of one thing, he would
never tolerate you for the sake of your glorious principles of Civil
and religious liberty." -- (Rambler, one of the most prominent
Catholic papers of England, Sept., 1851.)


WHICH WOULD YOU WANT IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD!

How about William Suzanne telling us that ELLEN WHITE, dead for almost
100 years, IS THE ANTICHRIST!! When Christ comes, He will smell like
a rose just ressurrecting Ellen White to punish her for destroying the
earth!!

In His Grace,

Susan Williams