29th March 17:46
= IN GOD WE TRUST= (god songs subjective year spacetime)
On 23 Feb 2007 08:18:36 -0800, "jesshc"
That is where you are sadly mistaken.... and THAT is why
you can't understand what God is!
PHYSICS measures the size and speed of something relative
to "the clock on the wall" and "the ruler on the desk".
HOWEVER, a physics measurement is not what people
Example: If we are in a car and the speedometer says 55
then everyone AGREES that the "physics measurement" (also
called the "objective" measurement) of our speed is 55 mph.
However, the 5 year old kid in the back seat looks out the
windowm and says "boy, we're really going fast as blazes"
while the old man drivng the car says "sheeeet kind, we're
barely crawling... cars are passing me like crazy". OK...
these are "subjective" measurements of spacetime.
And that's the whole point..... a Physics book is all about
what a "standard clock" and a "standard ruler" (or a
"standard person" would see, while the Bible is all about
what "real people" actually see... and as we just
demonstrated.... all people agree on "objective
spacetime".... but NOBODY agrees with anyone else about the
size and speed of "subjective spacetime". And so
finally.... it is this DIFFERENCE in "subjective spacetime"
between people that causes the phenomena known as "GOD".
Finally, the AMAZING DISCOVERY that Hammond has made, is
that the difference in "subjective spacetime" between people
is described as a "curvature" of subjective spacetime where
the amount of curvature is proportional to the individual
person's brain growth. We note that a 9 year old has a 50%
brain growth, because people stop growing at age 18.
Yawn... talking to amateurs certainly is time consuming...
wherer are all the ****in geniuses?
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
29th March 17:46
= IN GOD WE TRUST= (esp god science)
Oh, I know what "god" is.
Oh, of course not. People live in an entirely different dimension
from physics. That's why there's ghosts and esp.
See, that's what's called an "unsupported assertion." You make a lot of those.
Where'd you learn science, the X-Files?
It's funny you ask that, while being unable to address what is
actually said. Your response has nothing to do with my point; you
merely wandered off on an unrelated, unsupported, nonsensical
tangent. I expected nothing less. At least you're consistent, but
why are you adding groups? To better the troll?