Dead Sea Scrolls (church atheist script convert discussion)
Interesting...
I found the following link which was also interesting to me:
http://www.ibiblio.org/expo/deadsea.scrolls.exhibit/Library/warrule.html
"This six-line fragment, commonly referred to as the "Pierced Messiah"
text, is written in a Herodian script of the first half of the first
century C.E. and refers to a Messiah from the Branch of David, to a
judgement, and to a killing."
"James D. Tabor A Pierced or Piercing Messiah? -- The Verdict is Still
Out Biblical Archaeology Review 18 (November - December 1992) Unbound
serial. Hebraic Section, African and Middle Eastern Division, Library
of Congress."
Even though the texts in the "War Rule" don't mention Jesus by name,
there are people who swear that it's talking about Jesus. They
started arguing about what pierced meant, just like they argued and
continue to argue about what "rock" means with regards to who was the
actual founder of the church of Jesus.
When I started the current email discussion with the fellow I
mentioned, it was because he said that he wanted to interview a
"humorous atheist" for a film he's shooting.
Here are his exact words from the initial email:
I said "sure" and from there we've had a few conversations in email,
but it seems that he might've been lying about actually shooting some
film to me. I told him it looked like he was just trying for a chance
to preach to me or convert me to Christianity.
Here's the next to last paragraph from his last email to me:
The final paragraph was all in caps!
IF JESUS WAS NOT THE SON OF GOD, YOU AND I WOULD NOT BE HAVING
THIS CONVERSATION. WE WOULD NOT KNOW WHO HE WAS. HE WOULD
HAVE DISAPPEARED LONG AGO. WHO WOULD HAVE POSSIBLY PERPETUATED
THE MEMORY OF THE CHARACTER THAT YOU DESCRIBE?
Sad or funny or what?
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
|