andrew

God does have a church universal. It is not the RCC or the various denominations; it is the
"general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven." Heb 12:23 It
consists of those who love God and keep His commandments. "Where two or three are
gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." Mt 18:20 Where Christ is
even among a humble few, there is His church universal. The presence of the High and Holy
One who inhabiteth eternity can alone constitute a church.

Your name may be enrolled in this church among the faithful of all ages in the Lamb's book
of life. But first you must renounce all allegiance to the lord of Darkness, and give yourself
to Jesus Christ - the head of the body, which is His church. Col 1:18


Andrew

susan williams

Jesuit Andrew says in his usual judgmentalism, personal attacks and
preaching against such::


I have told this demon too many times for Christ to be honored that...

I REFUSE TO DISREGARD THE DEATH MANDATE AGAINST ALL NON-CATHOLICS AND
ATTACK ONLY PEOPLE WHO ARE UPSET ABOUT IT AS ANDREW IS!

Do you want Andrew's Jesuit Christ readers?? He's already a killer,
and the man is deaf too!

What do you expect from the servants of the Antichrist?

In His Grace,

Susan

jcarew

JMJ


Catholic means universal. Until the Church spread
throughout the known world the word "universal"
wouldn't have made sense.

St Iraneus, I believe a disciple of John, wrote that
there were hundreds of heresies floating around before
the end of the first century, and referred to the Catholic
or universal Church as the one we should recognize. In
other words, the Church that teaches the same thing
everywhere, not affected by local heretical disruptions.

What "Catholic" Means

The Greek roots of the term "Catholic" mean "according to
(kata-) the whole (holos), or more colloquially, "universal."
At the beginning of the second century, we find in the
letters of Ignatius its first surviving use in reference to
the Church. At that time or shortly thereafter it was used to
refer to a single, visible communion, separate from others.

Because the term is in the Apostles', Nicene, and Athanasian
creeds, many Protestants try to claim it for themselves,
insisting that the catholic church is the invisible, universal
brotherhood of all believers--a completely unhistorical view
that flagrantly ignores the actual use of the term at the time
the creeds were written.

Early Church historian J. N. D. Kelly, a Protestant, writes:
"As regards 'Catholic' ... in the latter half of the second
century at latest, we find it conveying the suggestion that
the Catholic is the true Church as distinct from heretical
congregations (cf., e.g., Muratorian Canon) ... What these
early fathers were envisaging was almost always the empirical,
visible society; they had little or no inkling of the
distinction which was later to become important between a
visible and an invisible Church" (Early Christian Doctrines,
190)

Thus people who recite the creeds mentally inserting another
meaning for "Catholic" are reinterpreting them according to a
modern fancy, much as a liberal Bible scholar does with
Scripture texts offensive to contemporary sensibilities.

Included in the quotes below are extracts from the first
creeds to use the term "Catholic" so that it can be seen it
its historical context, which is supplied by the other
quotations. It is from this broader context that the meaning
of the term in the creeds is established, not by one's own
fancy of what the term once meant or what it ought to mean.

Ignatius of Antioch

"Let no one do anything of concern to the Church without the
bishop. Let that be considered a valid Eucharist which is
celebrated by the bishop or by one whom he ordains [i.e., a
presbyter]. Wherever the bishop appears, let the people be
there; just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the
Catholic Church" (Letter to the Smyrneans 8:2 [A.D. 110]).

The Martyrdom of Polycarp

"And of the elect, he was one indeed, the wonderful martyr
Polycarp, who in our days was an apostolic and prophetic
teacher, bishop of the Catholic Church in Smyrna. For every
word which came forth from his mouth was fulfilled and will
be fulfilled" (Martyrdom of Polycarp 16:2 [A.D. 155]).

The Muratorian Canon

"Besides these [letters of Paul] there is one to Philemon,
and one to Titus, and two to Timothy, in affection and love,
but nevertheless regarded as holy in the Catholic Church, in
the ordering of churchly discipline. There is also one
[letter] to the Laodiceans and another to the Alexandrians,
forged under the name of Paul, in regard to the heresy of
Marcion, and there are several others which cannot be
received by the Church, for it is not suitable that gall be
mixed with honey. The epistle of Jude, indeed, and the two
ascribed to John are received by the Catholic Church ... Of
[the Gnostics] Arsinorus, also called Valentine, and of
Miltiades, we receive nothing at all. Those also who
wrote the new book of psalms for Marcion, together with
Basilides, the founder of the Asian Cataphrygians
[we do not accept]" (Muratorian fragment [A.D. 177]).

Tertullian

"Where was [the heretic] Marcion, that shipmaster of Pontus,
the zealous student of Stoicism? Where was Valentinus, the
disciple of Platonism? For it is evident that those men lived
not so long ago--in the reign of Antonius for the most part--
and that they at first were believers in the doctrine of the
Catholic Church, in the church of Rome under the episcopate
of the blessed Eleutherius, until on account of their ever
restless curiosity, with which they even infected the brethren,
they were more than once expelled" (Demurrer Against the
Heretics 30 [A.D. 200]).

Cyprian of Carthage

"They alone have remained outside [the Church] who, were they
within, would have to be ejected ... There [in John 6:68
Letters 66[67]:8 [A.D. 253]).

Council of Nicaea I

"But those who say: 'There was [a time] when he [the Son] was
not,' and 'before he was born, he was not,' and 'because he was
made from non-existing matter, he is either of another substance
or essence,' and those who call 'God the Son of God changeable
and mutable,' these the Catholic Church anathematizes" (Appendix
to the Creed of Nicaea [A.D. 325]).

Council of Nicaea I

"Concerning those who call themselves Cathari [Novatians], that
is, 'the Clean,' if at any time they come to the Catholic
Church, it has been decided by the holy and great council
that, provided they receive the imposition of hands, they
remain among the clergy. However, because they are accepting
and following the doctrines of the Catholic and apostolic
Church, it is fitting that they acknowledge this in writing
before all; that is, both that they communicate with the twice
married and with those who have lapsed during a persecution"
(canon 8).

Council of Nicaea I

"Concerning the Paulianists who take refuge with the Catholic
Church, a decree has been published that they should be fully
baptized. If, however, any of these in times past have been in
the clerical order, if indeed they have appeared spotless and
above reproach, after being baptized, let them be ordained by
the bishop of the Catholic Church" (canon 9).

Cyril of Jerusalem

"[The Church] is called Catholic, then, because it extends
over the whole world, from end to end of the earth, and because
it teaches universally and infallibly each and every doctrine
which must come to the knowledge of men, concerning things
visible and invisible, heavenly and earthly, and because
it brings every race of men into subjection to godliness,
governors and governed, learned and unlearned, and because
it universally treats and heals every class of sins, those
committed with the soul and those with the body, and it
possesses within itself every conceivable form of virtue, in
deeds and in words and in the spiritual gifts of every
description" (Catechetical Lectures 18:23 [A.D. 350]).

Cyril of Jerusalem

"And if you ever are visiting in cities, do not inquire
simply where the house of the Lord is--for the others, sects
of the impious, attempt to call their dens 'houses of the
Lord'--nor ask merely where the Church is, but where is the
Catholic Church. For this is the name peculiar to this holy
Church, the Mother of us all, which is the Spouse of our Lord
Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God" (ibid., 18:26).

The Apostles Creed

"I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the
communion of saints, the f****veness of sins, the resurrection
of the body, and the life everlasting. Amen" (Apostles Creed
[A.D. 360 version, the first to include the term "Catholic"]).

Council of Constantinople I

"I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father, who together with the Father
and the Son is worshiped and glorified, who spoke through
the prophets; in one, holy, Catholic, and apostolic Church"
(Nicene Creed [A.D. 381]).

Council of Constantinople I

"Those who embrace orthodoxy and join the number of those
who are being saved from the heretics, we receive in the
following regular and customary manner: Arians, Macedonians,
Sabbatians, Novatians, those who call themselves Cathars
and Aristeri, Quartodecimians or Tetradites, Apollinarians
--these we receive when they hand in statements and
anathematize every heresy which is not of the same mind
as the holy, Catholic, and apostolic Church of God"
(canon 7).

Augustine

"We must hold to the Christian religion and to communication
in her Church, which is Catholic and which is called Catholic
not only by her own members but even by all her enemies. For
when heretics or the adherents of schisms talk about her, not
among themselves but with strangers, willy-nilly they call her
nothing else but Catholic. For they will not be understood
unless they distinguish her by this name which the whole world
employs in her regard" (The True Religion 7:12 [A.D. 390]).

Augustine

"We believe in the holy Church, that is, the Catholic Church;
for heretics and schismatics call their own congregations
churches. But heretics violate the faith itself by a false
opinion about God; schismatics, however, withdraw from
fraternal love by hostile separations, although they believe
the same things we do. Consequently, neither heretics nor
schismatics belong to the Catholic Church; not heretics,
because the Church loves God, and not schismatics, because
the Church loves neighbor" (Faith and Creed 10:21 [A.D. 393]).

Augustine

"In the Catholic Church ... a few spiritual men attain
[wisdom] in this life, in such a way that ... they know it
without any doubting, while the rest of the multitude finds
is greatest safety not in lively understanding but in the
simplicity of believing ... [T]here are many other things
which most properly can keep me in her bosom. The unanimity
of peoples and nations keeps me here. Her authority,
inaugurated in miracles, nourished by hope, augmented by love,
and confirmed by her age, keeps me here. The succession of
priests, from the very see of the Apostle Peter, to whom the
Lord, after his resurrection, gave the charge of feeding his
sheep [John 21:15Against the Letter of Mani Called 'The
Foundation' 4:5 [A.D. 397]).

Augustine

"If you should find someone who does not yet believe in the
gospel, what would you [Mani] answer him when he says, 'I do
not believe'? Indeed, I would not believe in the gospel myself
if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do
so" (ibid., 5:6).

Vincent of Lerins

"I have often then inquired earnestly and attentively of very
many men eminent for sanctity and learning, how and by what
sure and so to speak universal rule I may be able to distinguish
the truth of Catholic faith from the falsehood of heretical
depravity; and I have always, and in almost every instance,
received an answer to this effect:: that whether I or anyone
else should wish to detect the frauds and avoid the snares of
heretics as they arise, and to continue sound and complete in
the Catholic faith, we must, the Lord helping, fortify our own
belief in two ways: first, by the authority of the Divine Law
[Scripture], and then by the Tradition of the Catholic Church.
But here some one perhaps will ask, 'Since the canon of
Scripture is complete, and sufficient of itself for everything,
and more than sufficient, what need is there to join with it
the authority of the Church's interpretation?' For this reason:
Because, owing to the depth of Holy Scripture, all do not accept
it in one and the same sense, but one understands its words in
one way, another in another, so that it seems to be capable of
as many interpretations as there are men ... Therefore, it is
very necessary, on account of so great intricacies of such
various errors, that the rule for the right understanding of
the prophets and apostles should be framed in accordance with
the standard of ecclesiastical and Catholic interpretation"
(The Notebooks 2:1 )

Council of Chalcedon

"Since in certain provinces readers and cantors have been
allowed to marry, this sacred synod decrees that none of them
is permitted to marry a wife of heterodox views. If those thus
married have already had children, and if they have already had
the children baptized among heretics, they are to bring them
into the communion of the Catholic Church" (canon 14 [A.D.
451]).

Jim Carew sfo

andrew

You have refused many times.. but the appeal is still calling you
to repent before the door of mercy is finally and irrevocably shut.

Andrew

susan williams

I REFUSE TO TAKE LIGHTLY THE DEATH MANDATE AGAINST ALL NON-CATHOLICS!
NEITHER AM I IMPRESSED WITH JESUIT ANDREW'S DEAF ANTICHRIST. I HAVE
TOLD THE DEMON I REFUSE TO REJOICE IN THE DEATHS OF ALL NON-CATHOLICS!

That conclusion IS PERMANENT AND FINAL!

Neither will I accept a Christ with pitchforks and a tail who is just
as deaf as the Jesuits of which Andrew belongs.


I acknowledge the superficial stated tennets of HOMELAND SECURITY! I
don't support the worst targets of it like Jesuit Andrew!


In His Grace,


Susan

andrew

You hereby do take God's name in vain and refuse to acknowledge the
living Christ but give daily service to the great enemy of God and man.

susan williams

I don't care what you say damned Jesuit Andrew!!

I REFUSE TO ACCEPT YOUR ANTICHRIST AND THEREBY ATTACK PEOPLE WHO OBEY
HOMELAND SECURITY AND UNCOVER DEATH MANDATES AGAINST ALL
NON-CATHOLICS!

IS IT CHRIST WHO TAUGHT YOU THAT YOU ARE NON-CATHOLIC? You claim to
be!

I see death mandates against all non-Catholics. You attack those who
expose it! AGAIN FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME:

STOP OBEYING THE JESUIT OATH AND GET A HEARING AID!

I WILL NOT ACCEPT YOUR ANTICHRIST!


In His Grace,


Susan

poly

Are Adventists a branch of the Jesuit?

susan williams

Don't play dumb, Jesuit Poly wanna cracker!

DO ADVENTIST GET ANGRY AND HATE PEOPLE WHO EXPOSE MEMBERS OF A CULT
WHO DEMAND THE EXTERMINATION OF ALL NON-CATHOLICS?

Would such a non-Catholic then have the authority to say we are insane
and constantly beg us to accept his Antichrist? Remember, you are
asking me the question and not the incredible so-called "Adventist"
who hated us for exposing a death mandate against all non-Catholics!

You are a Jesuit just like Andrew!

Here is that mandate:

===========

A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when
with approval he told us that:

"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"

You can find that statement here as I submit the evidence:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&group=alt.religion.christian.adventist&scoring=r&as_drrb=b&as_mind=5&as_minm=10&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=7&as_maxm=10&as_maxy=2001&selm=55de15cf.0110071743.205a5dea%40posting.google.com

Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks
when America was assessng what a terrorist was with respect to human
life.

Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave.
He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to
have disappeared from it.

Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done
to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how
Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has
mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To
accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free
media and teach people how they must understand that people will
disagree.

That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called
himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of
lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is
Constitutional!

He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent)
Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.

I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't
upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. As usual, the
super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the
Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!

Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned
all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even
those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that
Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for
Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this.
However, since we started this work, another person came out more
boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She
posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great\0
Christian work Foxe's Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of
uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the
work as:

"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." She therefore approved of their deaths
because they viewed religion differently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b0165u09im%40drn.newsguy.com
1/14/2003

Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country.

Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called
Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only
referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003
who were a minority group of Christians during that time:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01pej%40drn.newsguy.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3424526807d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26 lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3Dbb521t01pej%2540drn.newsguy.com>

How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:

Teresita belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses
when she condemned the Christian martyrs as "hereticks" by condemning
Tyndale, who was not one of the Albigenses:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com>

NEXT:

When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained
to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the
Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of
Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies.
Here she is freely admitting what all those "Anti-Catholics" and
"Catholic-haters" have been saying all along:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl270768597d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb5kmo0vt2%40drn.newsguy.com>

Here is that dialogue below:

From: Teresita (teresita@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly

Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs86mheig36vm8nec6s@4ax.com>, Susan says...


Teresita replies:
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:

Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."


ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT??

LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl175085396d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bkkqlo0b0g%40drn.newsguy.com

After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly admitting is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, this is how she declared Rome didn't hate her victims
she was killing: I wrote:
In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l7dk45d4e25165n5ev@4ax.com>, Susan Williams says...


Teresita replies:
It's nothing personal. It's just business.

--
Encyclopedia Teresita

Now the man who was ready to pull out his hair telling us that Ted
Seeber didn't represent Rome when he condemned the lives of all
non-Catholics is nowhere to be found with Teresita boldly confirming
the same. Instead he attacks the Adventist Church as a dangerous
cult:
Super-terrorist William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
True Adventist are not like that. The problem is that demon-possessed
killers from the Antichrist such as William Suzanne have infiltrated
our church to the CORE. That is why when Ted Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics to persecution and death, Paul Tooley came in to lie
claimng that he didn't do that, and then attacked me for exposing him.
They are trying to tell us that is standard behavior for Adventiss and
that I am not one.

Antichrist Andrew then attacked, claiming that by Brother Ted
frequently posting, he has childhood trauma and a dysfunctional home.
All of these said not the slightest word against the man who condemned
them to death.

COMPARE THE ISSUES THE SUPER-TERRORIST IS BRINGING AGAINST THE
ADVENTIST CHURCH WITH WHAT I'M SHIOWING YOU AND SEE WHAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD! William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
Will Adventists tell you that you must protect a man who has condemned
the lives of all non-Catholics? Will they then tell you that a person
who exposes such a person is hateful and Satans child as William
Suzanne, Lamarr Edwards, "Adventist" Paul Tooley and "Adventist"
Andrew have done?

COMPARE THE ISSUES THE SUPER-TERRORIST IS BRINGING AGAINST THE
ADVENTIST CHURCH WITH WHAT I'M SHIOWING YOU AND SEE WHAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD! William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
I would tell anyone that. But do you know folks that the major reasn
Rome has shed more blood than any institution on earth was because all
those centuries of the Christian era SHE HAS BEEN SAYING THAT SHE WAS
THE ONLY TRUE CHURCH?? Do you know that she recently published a
public do***ent REAFFIRMING THIS??

Now the man is telling us the Adventist Church is trying to hide the
claim. Rome doesn't hide the claim. Would something smell bad if the
Evangelical community accepts Rome anyway even though her claims to be
the true church always invovles the shedding of much blood to those
who disagree?

Watch the demon work: William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
Now listen to what the Protestants used to say BEFORE, so that we can
figure out if something has taken possession of them:

"But even with such a great cloud of witnesses, one might be tempted
to ask the following question, 'Has not Rome changed recently?' To
answer this most vital question, I turn once again to the message of
D. Martyn Lloyd Jones:

'Ah, but,' you say, 'has not the Roman Catholic Church changed? You
are simply looking back, you are speaking as if you lived in the 16th
century - don't you realize you are living in the 20th century?

My answer is quite simple. The proudest boast of the Roman Catholic
Church is this, that she never changes, Semper eadem. How can she
change? If she changes she will be admitting that she was wrong in the
past - but she was saying then that she was infallible, and that the
Pope is the Vicar of Christ and that he cannot make a mistake. If she
says that she is capable of change she is denying her central claim!
She does not say that she is changing, and she never will. The Church
of Rome remains the same.

If anything, she is even worse. She has 'added' things to what she
taught in the 16th century, such as Papal infallibility, etc. No,
there is no change in the Church of Rome. And if there ever is one
great world Church, it will be because the Church of Rome has absorbed
all the rest and swallowed them in ignorance!'
============= William Suzanne:


Susan Williams:
What the super-terrorists won't tell you AND WHAT THEY HAVE NOT
RETRACTED! COMPARE THE "CRIMES!":

"If Catholics ever gain a sufficient numerical majority in this
country, religious freedom is at an end. So our enemies say, SO WE
BELIEVE" (The Shepherd of the Valley, official journal of the Bishop
of St Louis, Nov. 23, 1851).

William Suzanne claiming to quote Adventist sources:

Susan Williams:
"No man has a right to choose his religion." -- (New York Freeman,
official journal of Bishops Hughes, Jan. 26, 1852). William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
"The church . . . does not, and cannot accept, or in any degree favor,
liberty in the Protestant sense of liberty." -- (Catholic World,
April, 1870.)

"Protestantism has not, and never can have, any right where
Catholicity has triumphed." -- (Catholic Review, June, 1875) William Suzanne:

Susan Williams:
"Religious Liberty is merely endured UNTIL THE OPPOSITE CAN BE CARRIED
INTO EFFECT WITHOUT PERIL TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH." -- (Rt. Rev.
O'Connor, Bishop of Pittsburgh.)

"The absurd and erroneous doctrines or ravings in defense of liberty
of conscience are a most pestilential error--a pest, of all others,
most to be dreaded in a state." -- Encyclical Letter of Pope Pius IX,
August 15, 1854.

"There is, ere long, to be a state religion in this country, and that
state religion is to be the Roman Catholic. . . The Roman Catholic is
to wield his vote for the purpose of securing Catholic ascendancy in
this country." -- (Father Hecker, Catholic World, July, 1870.)

"If the liberties of the American people are ever destroyed, they will
fall by the hands of the Catholic clergy." -- Lafayette

"You ask if the Pope were lord over this land and you were in a
minority, what he would do to you? That, we say, would entirely depend
on cir***stances. If it would benefit the cause of Catholicism, he
would tolerate you: if expedient, he would imprison, banish you,
probably he might even hang you. But be assured of one thing, he would
never tolerate you for the sake of your glorious principles of Civil
and religious liberty." -- (Rambler, one of the most prominent
Catholic papers of England, Sept., 1851.)


WHICH WOULD YOU WANT IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD!

How about William Suzanne telling us that ELLEN WHITE, dead for almost
100 years, IS THE ANTICHRIST!! When Christ comes, He will smell like
a rose just ressurrecting Ellen White to punish her for destroying the
earth!!

In His Grace,

Susan Williams

john w

External User

 

Posts: 1

x-no-archive:yes


Agreed, Andrew. Well put. John W


__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>