a.t. tapman

I do not think a 'magic bullet' single gene is responsible for any single
behavioral pattern. It is likely a combination of genes, and their frequency
of occurrence within each of the races, which define each group. There will,
of course, be some overlap within the spectrum of gene combinations which will
tend to blur the margins.
How do you suppose 'stereotypes' came into being? Do you think stereotypes are baseless?

If we were to build a profile of the average negro in America, and I were to
befriend him, I would find a person very unlike myself. We would share very
little common ground, we would likely have difficulty communicating in a
meaningful fashion. If you would like me to list the differences I will, but
it seems a meaningless exercise. I am sure you are aware of where I am going with this.

I see no contradiction, I stated that the races generally prefer to live among
their racial brethren.
Governmental interference, Section 8 housing and the like has skewed the
above. To quote Tom Shelly "No other race or no other group in the world
needs laws or forced brainwashing to get others to accept them."

You may be too young to remember the 'protests' by whites concerning forced
bussing and relocation of Low Income housing into white neighborhoods, but
they did and do continue to occur.
Perhaps you have an alternative explanations for white flight, if so, It would interest me greatly.


What does a personal grievance have to do with a philosophical point of view?

And pretend not to notice what is occurring around us.
Notice the silly slogans like "diversity is our strength", how many really
believe such nonsense? How many pretend to believe?


I take it you do not acknowledge a 'natural order'?


It is far more common among negroes, it is far less common among the other races.

In light of the frequency of criminal activities of this group, as indicated
by the statistics published by the Justice Dept, what other plausible conclusion exists?


One never knows, perhaps never, but history and human nature indicate
otherwise. We are on uncharted territory.

If that is the criterion for societal contributions, a pet dog, who fetches
the paper, is also a contributor.


It simply indicates you are capable of more complicated tasks. You find this worthless?

Usually it is just that simple, the majority of racists of AFN are 'guilty' of
little more than benign neglect. I doubt many of them go out of their way to harm negroes.


Governmental jobs do little positive good for the economy as a whole.
Remember, that money comes principally from the productive sector of society,
tax them too heavily and the 'golden goose' dies.


The simple explanation works in the vast majority of cases, usually the
questions which deal with cases about the margins are the only ones which
require a more complete picture.

Why is 49.9% significant? Why not 40% or 30%?

But what if the solution makes the general public uncomfortable? Should a
good leader forge ahead for the good of society?

Your friend,
A.T. Tapman