You should be careful. You're in danger of
agreeing with me.
Language is always and necessarily communal property.
Or at the very least jointly owned property.
It is simply useless if it is not.
As such, it is always possible that it will
become a victim of "the tragedy of the commons".
Hence the problem with Ego which you described.
But the main problem with a universal language is:
what could you possibly have to say that would
be relevant to everybody? And not only relevant,
but also interesting to them and believed by them?
And furthermore, if you could speak to everyone in
the world, then so could everyone else. We would
be buried in a flood of words, all of them struggling
to get our attention.
I am not a lawyer. I do not even see email sent to this address, due to
past DOS attacks. If you wish to respond, do so through this newsgroup.