dpchitester

The response from 'OSA' on this and other recent posts was so severe
as to keep me off posting for quite a period.

Threats, button-pushing, case mis-handling and mis-repair,
anchor-point manipulating, implanting, there really is nothing
'missing' from the OSA OT arsenal and I am not too interested in being
subjected to it on a multi-day basis.

If there were gods, I would request them to tell OSA to knock it off,
but since there aren't (apparently), I'll probably be found dead in
the next few weeks. If that happens, there would be no question that
OTs were involved. It is just a matter of fact that the Church hates
me as much as the rest of the a.r.s. posters -- as if some undesirable
effect was being created.

IS there some undesirable effect being created?

It could only be that I am exposing too much truth, as usual.

Phil

magoo

"JB@nowhere" <mblackjack1@,cox.net> wrote in message news:6tWlb.109676$gv5.43747@fed1read05...


Just curious Jack...why did you take my site off this list, and arnie's?
Both of them have the
Facts about how OSA actively tried to spam ARS and stop free speech. Also, I
believe I am the only OT 7 who has a Web site up,
which *might* be important to various people.

I respect your decision not to, but if I recall, before it was part of the
list, and now it isn't. Just curious...was there something said?
Please fill me in......

All the best

Tory/Magoo!~ http://www.torymagoo.org http://www.lermanet.com/cos/toryonosa.htm

ot iii

Just curious Jack...why did you take my site off this list, and arnie's?
Both of them have the
Facts about how OSA actively tried to spam ARS and stop free speech. Also, I
believe I am the only OT 7 who has a Web site up,
which *might* be important to various people.

I respect your decision not to, but if I recall, before it was part of the
list, and now it isn't. Just curious...was there something said?
Please fill me in......

All the best

Tory/Magoo!~
http://www.torymagoo.org
http://www.lermanet.com/cos/toryonosa.htm

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dear Tory:

Is that true that you are the only OT VII with a web site up?

What about Virginia and Mike, they clearly state what their
exact opposition is to the church?

Is it because you just want people to get the facts about OSA?

Tory, OSA in my opinion, whether it makes a difference to you
or not, is a rather weak floundering type of group that will act on
lies more conveniently to "support" Scientology rather than to deal
with living facts. Some of the facts are presented on yours and
Arnie's websites and some are not.

OT III - SP 4

doubledrooks2003

Read the posts listed below and you will know the truth of what I'm all about.

Truth Seeker
"OSA Stands for: (O)perations by (S)uppressive (A)ssholes"

================================================== ===

If you want to know what Scientology doesn't want you
to know, take a look these posts that I've put up earlier on
this newsgroup. (That's if the Church of "Suppress Free Speech"
hasn't illegally cancelled them)

"How to tell a real critic of Scientology from a phony one"
"How you know you've just read phony criticism created by Scientology"
"Scientology's Plan to Stop Critics & Criticism on this newsgroup"
"The key to how Scientology is handling this newsgroup"
"Why you should stay away from Scientology"
"The FAQ for Alt.Religion.Scientology"
"Names Scientology is Posting by on this newsgroup"
"Tactics OSA uses to stop critics on this newsgroup"
"The Magical Transformation of Church Member into Critic"
"How Scientology is playing both sides of the coin"
"Scientology's Decoy System"
"The 3 beliefs Scientology wants the world to believe"
"Some different Ways to "Handle" Scientology"
"How Scientology Traps New Members"
"Scientology's Trick to keep people from REAL criticism"
"Weaknesses of the Church of Scientology"
"How Scientology creates identity confusion"

zinj

In article <f6c105bb.0310291958.191eefe3@posting.google.com>,
doubledrooks2003@yahoo.com says...


Since you have posted the same posts dozens, if not hundreds of
times, is there a particular instance you want people to read?

After all; they must be different, otherwise it would be spam.
But, according to you, you don't spam.
Right 'Truth' Seeker?

Zinj
--
Scientology® - Deliberately killing no more than 0.5 percent of
its members since 1953

anonymous

I think the one with the functional brain is off tonight. This one can only
repost the same drivel. The argumentative one seems to be on break.

----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

captangst

Don't forget the one with the potty mouth.

Or the one that thinks all of it's nicknames are in reference to other posters.
I just LUV that one.

Angst
---
"Pay not attention to the git(s) behind the Spammin'!"