jimmcginn

NA, you're inclined to making all encompassing allusions
to the notion of paleohabitat reconstruction but you're
unable to provide any details on why you think your
thinking is right and that of others is wrong. You're
a bag of hot air.


Yes, it's evasiveness. There really is no other way
to see it.


Isn't the word "provisional," just a means of dismissing
the overwhelming vagueness of your thinking? Be honest.
I don't think it amounts to a scenario. I think you just
like to pretend you know what you're talking about but
you really don't have any experience or expertise with
paleohabitat reconstruction. Isn't this the actual truth?

So you make vague allusions to Kaye Reed's paper and,
suddenly, you have a hypothesis.

This is not obvious. This is nothing but you're little
paleofantasy, an attempty to bend reality so that it
fits your silly little efficiency walking nonsense.

Jim