john edser

JE:-
Nobody can prove that 1 + 1 = 2, just one apple + one apple equals a total
of two apples, which is not at all the same thing.

As Felsenstein has proven time and time again, HR remains based on just a
tautology. ANY 100% relative proposition is so based. If anybody proffers a
tautology as a valid theory of nature they only end up with an irrefutable
proposition describing contradictory empirical events. Because mathematics
is not empirically based, contradictions that do not exist in the real world
are allowed. You can do just about anything you like within mathematical
heuristic models, even run time backwards and raise the dead. OTOH science
always was and will always remain, 100% empirically based so empirical
contradictions ARE NOT allowed.

The critical constant that Hamilton et al deleted was TDF (Total Darwinian
Fitness). I have shown that it alone could _empirically_ halt all selection
within a natural population for a significant period of time. Hamilton's
deletion of TDF allowed cause and effect to become entirely reversed in HR
just to be able to force altruism at the organism level via selfishness at a
heuristic gene level within just a tautology which alone can allow such an
empirically based contradiction. Today Neo Darwinistic misuse is complete:
they allow an oversimplified heuristic exercise to compete, win and finally
replace the refutable theory it was oversimplified from which was Darwinism.
This and similar misused models have destroyed evolutionary theory while at
the same time throwing open the doors of school science classes to
irrefutable "Intelligent Design Theory". The fascist religious right could
not believe its luck when the Looney Left was allowed to take charge of
evolutionary theory because they were and remain relative opposites of
exactly the same tyranny: totalitarianism which can only provide a "science"
of dictates.

Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

edser@tpg.com.au