don

There we go, ...No problem. Of 128,000 pages on plate tectonics there
is only one with the string "how transforms form". Guess who..
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/transforms.html

What does that tell you about the state of consensus knowledge about
the most basic structure of the ocean floor? So now when people
Ask-a-George about how transforms form, Answer-a-George can tell them
with cool aplomb. (Can't you Georgie boy?) Go on George, put me a
link on your site and get second top spot. The wurld is waiting for
us...

george

It tells me that you not only don't know how to use google, it tells me that
you don't know how to read.

jean-paul turcaud

" George" <George@george.net> a écrit dans le message de
news:miwXb.68561$uS3.20869@bignews4.bellsouth.net. ..

Yep Georges ...but you, YOU know to read, but unfortunately you are not
able as yet to make any sense of what you read.
.... and further all during that time I have known you, you have made no
attempt at improving yourself.
You better start to day !
YES !

Reading, as you have never been taught, is a most complex exercise.

It is made of :
1) Non information or retained information
2) Over information
3) Biased or misleading information
4) Truncated information.
5) Plain attempt at influencing your judgment.
6) Undisguised dishonesty at pretending all pending incoherence of present
Theories will be clarified by further research.
7) Undisguised dishonesty at pretending all present theories supported by
consensus are correct.
8) Undisguised dishonesty at pretending that advance in science can be
reached only through "palabres" or never-ending-discussions, of Official
recognised & worthless-degrees loaded so called scientists
9) Undisguised dishonesty at pretending all pending problems can be only
considered & solved through pair-reviews exchanges of so-called scientific
views.

What I have to express to you is a twin concept :

Those who revel in ludicrous idiocies such as the Glaaaciations, Continental
Rafting + other Horrid Gogological fraudulent intellectual criminal
understandings, must be denied all rights to be called Teachers, Lectures &
Professors .... and must be considered for what they are to wit : most Evil
Intellectual Criminals leading Humanity astray since Centuries !

All advances in Humanity have never the fact of the Mob, nor of the
consensus of the Mob, nor of the discoveries of the Mob !!! .... but always
the result of the superior understanding of few and far apart Initiators,
whose superior Intelligence has been able to lead Humanity at large in new
directions towards GLOBAL AND SYNTHETIC UNDERSTANDING ! ... and the True
Geology is just an occasion to verify the validity of such rule.


..Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australian Mining Pioneer
Hydro & Mining Prospector _ Senior Geologist
Discoverer & Legal Owner of Telfer; Kintyre & Nifty Mines
The Great Sandy Desert.of Australia
Discoverer of the South Atlantic Submarine Gold Placers
( 40 Millions Tons estimate )
Founder of the TRUE GEOLOGY

~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~

don

It tells me, just as JP says, about mob rule. Thousands of people are
well-practised at writing using the readily recognised shibboleths,
but unashamedly avoid the issue when it comes to having a go
themselves. (Sheep)

plates "move past each other" = 413
plates "move past one another" = 267

"how plates move past each other"
Your search - "how plates move past each other" - did not match any
documents.
"How plates move past one another"
Your search - "How plates move past one another" - did not match any
documents.

But George can't read... What are you talking about JP? He only
makes a pretense at writing too. He even thinks he's a cut-and-paste
expert, but if he can post items on the oceans disappearing down
plugholes in the ocean floors as evidence for them evaporating off
into space, I doubt very much any real competence in that area either.
(He does rely heavily on 'point-and-click' His idea of bang-bang, I
think think.)

i.warren

Just in case you missed it from the last time I postet - http://www.scirus.com.
It's a much better science search engine than google.

Basic Search Advanced Search Search Preferences
All journal sourcesAll Web sourcesExact phrase

Searched for:: All of the words:transform fault formation

Found:: :14,462 total | 2,381 journal results | 12,081 Web results

Cheers,
Ian

don

You have to use the words in relevant guessed connections, but even
"transform fault" "fault formation" is too broad. You have to think of
someone grappling with it like a multi-headed hydra, staying awake at
night, beating their children (and their grandchildren) (and the
neighbours' children), and think of the words they might desperately
key in to find an answer, and to see if anyone else was grappling
desperately with the same problem, and the words they would have to
start with (having spent God knows how many months scrollingdown the
numbers you list are surely:-
"how transforms form"
"how transform faults form"
Both of which return Zilch.
If they return zero, there's little hope of an answer being found in
any of those other links, given that the most relevant ones probably
appear first.

What next then, horror of horrors? They gotta think for themselves
and use a little common sense? Wow. Ah, but then you can george it,
and say "of course, of course, transforms are the means by which one
plate moves past another". And leavi it at that. Problem solved.
"The answer to this problem is well known: Everyone knows (read "Junk
science") that transforms are the mechanism by which one plate moves
past one another. Just about all of plate tectonics is circular in
that kind of way (because of the initial assumptions)

What is plate tectonics' answer to the predilection for 'single
transforms' to occur in well defined pairs? Now someone answer that
one. I wouldn't even BEGIN to search for an answer in scirus or
google, because if that one was answered it would be ALL Earth
expansion already.

http://users.indigo.net.au/don/pr/transprofile.html#snap

(Scirus? I bet it uses google anyway.)

george

news:<efPXb.45291$9k7.924159@news.xtra.co.nz>...


In other words, if Don's web site doesn't come up , ignore everything
else!!! What a dweeb.

jean-paul turcaud

" George" <George@george.net> a écrit dans le message de
news:ckYXb.2404$kR3.1300@bignews4.bellsouth.net...


Don's demonstration conclusive, Georges. You are again taking the tangent
and running away from the main issue.
Have you heard of words called adverbs such as Why and How ?
Please look them up in the Oxford, since it might not be too late for you
to start using such.
Those little treasures of semantic, might help you to pull out from your
present slavish intellectual state.
jp