![]() |
|
SPONSORED LINKS BY GOOGLE |
|
2
8th September 18:39
External User
Posts: 1
|
Pablo, I must correct you. You mean "numerals", not numbers.
Furthermore, your first example would look (just very slightly) more convincing if viewed using a font with proportional spacing. Now: since the kind of thing to which you allude is in the eye of the beholder, and therefore subject neither to proof nor disproof, I suggest the following exercise: look at the Arabic form of numerals (0x0660 to 0x0669 in UniCode). You will find at least one such numeral which does not have the property which you claim. (Alternatively, if you think that they all do too, when was the last time you had an eye test?) Lastly, please note that the correct plural of "penis" is "penes" - from the Latin, obviously. (And, once again, to avoid accusations of sexism, note that, switching to Greek, the correct plural of "clitoris" is "clitorides" ....) Best wishes, John johnDOTmorrisonATtescoDOTnet -- "I note from what you say that you are clearly a master of the ancient and honourable Japanese art of bullshido." - Fred W. Enga PS Just why _do_ people post such things in mathematical newsgroups? --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.699 / Virus Database: 456 - Release Date: 04-Jun-04 |
|
|
SPONSORED LINKS BY GOOGLE |
|
|