Mombu the Science Forum sponsored links

Go Back   Mombu the Science Forum > Science > Some THEORETiCAL support for Cahill
User Name
Password
REGISTER NOW! Mark Forums Read

sponsored links


Reply
 
1 1st July 09:44
brian a m stuckless
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Some THEORETiCAL support for Cahill



$$ < SNiCKER >

$$ The THREE (3) MOST UNreal (GR-sample of the) *PROBLEM* DOCTORs:
1. [Dr Feynman, "solved" ANY physics PROBLEM with ARROWs-of-TiME].
2. [Dr Pusch, "solving" ANY physics PROBLEMs with 'ASAP MOMENTs'].
3. [Dr Roberts RE-solves ANY physics PROBLEM with his ERROR-BARs].

$$ With THREE of THE most POPULAR "SOLUTiONs" in "modern physics":
$$ 1. Overly, *oscillating* ARROWs-of-TiME.
$$ 2. Sudden 'ASAP' *delayed* "MOMENTs".
$$ 3. Too, *GR re-solved* ERROR-BARs.

$$ Similar to Feynman, Tom Roberts is too embarassed, to refer to
$$ ..or sign his own posts, as a REAL doctor. (A typical GR Ph.D).

A GENERAL UNiVERSAL EQUATiON-of-STATE SYSTEM 'frame-of-reference'.
The BiG ToE < Transcendental Physics (TP) >< TRUE physical 2007 >.
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes




Copyright © 2006 SmartyDevil.com - Dies Mies Jeschet Boenedoesef Douvema Enitemaus -
666