WHY DEATH OF SCIENCE IS IRREVERSIBLE
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000313/ p.4:
"Even deliberate attempts at careful formulation of the Second Law
sometimes end up in a paradox. One sometimes finds a formulation which
admits that thermodynamics aims only at the description of systems in
equilibrium states, and that, strictly speaking, a system does not
always have an entropy during a process. The Second Law, in this view,
refers to processes of an isolated system that begin and end in
equilibrium states and says that the entropy of the final state is
never less than that of the initial state (Sklar 1974, p. 381). The
problem is here that, by definition, states of equilibrium remain
unchanged in the course of time, unless the system is acted upon. Thus,
an increase of entropy occurs only if the system is disturbed, i.e.
when it is not isolated."
Einstein offered much more efficient conundrums, e.g. equivalent to "I
measure your clock to be slower than mine and you measure mine to be
slower than yours but if you go and return you will find mine to be
faster than yours". The secret of such conundrums is that any attempt
at disentagling them intensifies the destruction of human rationality.
Intelligent students abandon science, less intelligent students
discover the equation
science = learning by rote
However conundrums develop (the progress of science cannot be stopped)
and in the end even learning by rote becomes too difficult. At that
very moment the University and College Union (UCU) declares
"potentially irreversible decline of UK science that could soon see
parts of the UK unable to provide courses in both science and maths":
http://www.politics.co.uk/press-releases/education/higher-education/higher-education/ucu-report-reveals-that-latest-physics-closure-part-decline-in-uk-science-$458709.htm
Pentcho Valev
|