Mombu the Science Forum sponsored links

Go Back   Mombu the Science Forum > Science > Cometary motion and absurdities of modern physics
User Name
Password
REGISTER NOW! Mark Forums Read

sponsored links


Reply
 
1 4th June 21:55
sorin
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Cometary motion and absurdities of modern physics


Cometary motion and absurdities of modern
physics

As far the material about electromagnetic waves and photons is not
finished, I want to unearth an old field of astronomy, more precisely
cometary motion. Mainstream science accept as valid a classical theory
of gravitation, completed later with a sophisticated mathematical one,
more precisely general relativity. The later is able to explain some
small deficiencies for the former one, like Mercury perihelion
advance.
For actual astronomers cometary motion is already a closed field and
it seems all is clear and shining. But if someone is looking in old
books of astronomy and thinks a little bit of what was already


acceleration of gaseous nodosities in cometary tail and they concluded
these accelerations are a multiple of 22,4. For some comets, these
measurements were done before someone knew the significance of this
number; more precisely represents the volume of a mol of gas.
As far no theory was ever able to explain this correlation between gas
acceleration and molar volume, modern reference astronomy books have
been avoided to remind the subject, at least.
Around 1993, I finished a new theory of gravitation able to describe
the movement celestial bodies inside Solar system and, of course,
there is a special attention granted to cometary motion.
At this link (in English, because was posted in 2007!) there are some
comets cases and an explanation for this phenomenon.
http://www.elkadot.com/en/gravitation.html
The accepted explanation for the cometary motion can be disproved by
simple facts known due to the manmade Earth satellite movements. So,
in case of comets it is possible to have a fragmentation of comet in
few parts, every part having mass of ktones or even greater, and solar
wind is able to push differently these fragments and finally they are
entering on different orbits around Sun. In opposition, for manmade
satellite, the same solar wind is not able to change their orbits in a
radical way even their masses is on the order of few hundreds
kilograms and not thousands of tons. Of course, manmade satellites
orbits are suffering small corrections from time to time due to the
friction with upper atmosphere or even interaction with solar wind.
Further, looking a little bit into detail, no consistent explanation
was offered for the formation of anomalous tails of comets directed
toward Sun. After some theories, these are only an optical effect due
to the observer position.
No credible explanation was ever formulated by mainstream science for
the wideness of meteoric currents.
No relativistic theory ever dared to adventure to describe such
motions. Maybe now with some tensorial formula or with some
relativistic acrobatics theoreticians will try to fix this problem?
In the new working book related to Astronomy and astrophysics the
subject will be treated with more practical approach.

Best regards,
Sorin Cosofret
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


2 4th June 21:55
sorin
External User
 
Posts: 1
Default Cometary motion and absurdities of modern physics


Cometary motion and absurdities of modern
physics

As far the material about electromagnetic waves and photons is not
finished, I want to unearth an old field of astronomy, more precisely
cometary motion. Mainstream science accept as valid a classical theory
of gravitation, completed later with a sophisticated mathematical one,
more precisely general relativity. The later is able to explain some
small deficiencies for the former one, like Mercury perihelion
advance.
For actual astronomers cometary motion is already a closed field and
it seems all is clear and shining. But if someone is looking in old
books of astronomy and thinks a little bit of what was already


acceleration of gaseous nodosities in cometary tail and they concluded
these accelerations are a multiple of 22,4. For some comets, these
measurements were done before someone knew the significance of this
number; more precisely represents the volume of a mol of gas.
As far no theory was ever able to explain this correlation between gas
acceleration and molar volume, modern reference astronomy books have
been avoided to remind the subject, at least.
Around 1993, I finished a new theory of gravitation able to describe
the movement celestial bodies inside Solar system and, of course,
there is a special attention granted to cometary motion.
At this link (in English, because was posted in 2007!) there are some
comets cases and an explanation for this phenomenon.
http://www.elkadot.com/en/gravitation.html
The accepted explanation for the cometary motion can be disproved by
simple facts known due to the manmade Earth satellite movements. So,
in case of comets it is possible to have a fragmentation of comet in
few parts, every part having mass of ktones or even greater, and solar
wind is able to push differently these fragments and finally they are
entering on different orbits around Sun. In opposition, for manmade
satellite, the same solar wind is not able to change their orbits in a
radical way even their masses is on the order of few hundreds
kilograms and not thousands of tons. Of course, manmade satellites
orbits are suffering small corrections from time to time due to the
friction with upper atmosphere or even interaction with solar wind.
Further, looking a little bit into detail, no consistent explanation
was offered for the formation of anomalous tails of comets directed
toward Sun. After some theories, these are only an optical effect due
to the observer position.
No credible explanation was ever formulated by mainstream science for
the wideness of meteoric currents.
No relativistic theory ever dared to adventure to describe such
motions. Maybe now with some tensorial formula or with some
relativistic acrobatics theoreticians will try to fix this problem?
In the new working book related to Astronomy and astrophysics the
subject will be treated with more practical approach.

Best regards,
Sorin Cosofret
  Reply With Quote


  sponsored links


Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes




Copyright 2006 SmartyDevil.com - Dies Mies Jeschet Boenedoesef Douvema Enitemaus -
666