pentcho valev

Some time ago Lee Smolin asked "Where are the Einsteinians?" and
revealed the ultimate cause for his concern:

http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_4.3/smolin.htm Lee Smolin: "Quantum
theory was not the only theory that bothered Einstein. Few people have
appreciated how dissatisfied he was with his own theories of
relativity. Special relativity grew out of Einstein's insight that the
laws of electromagnetism cannot depend on relative motion and that the
speed of light therefore must be always the same, no matter how the
source or the observer moves. Among the consequences of that theory
are that energy and mass are equivalent (the now-legendary
relationship E = mc2) and that time and distance are relative, not
absolute. SPECIAL RELATIVITY WAS THE RESULT OF 10 YEARS OF
INTELLECTUAL STRUGGLE, YET EINSTEIN HAD CONVINCED HIMSELF IT WAS WRONG
within two years of publishing it."

The question "Where are the Einsteinians?" is getting more and more
relevant. A search in Internet would show that important Einsteinians
have deleted dithyrambic texts from their websites, constantly hint at
"small relativity violations", "variable speed of light", "emission
theory of light", "signals faster than light" etc. and are apparently
waiting for something. So another relevant question is: Waiting for
what? Perhaps important Einsteinians have realised that the old
principle "Salaries for worshipping Einstein" will soon be revoked.
Logically (Einsteinians are great logicians), the new principle will
be "Salaries for refuting Einstein". And Einsteinians are waiting for
its promulgation.

Pentcho Valev

nuny

Sooooooo, you've been bitching all this time because you haven't
been making money because you don't buy Relativity?

Do you expect back pay for all that time, or what?


Mark L. Fergerson

h. wabnig

On 3 Apr 2007 22:57:16 -0700, "Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com>


We were waiting for you and Androcles to demonstrate

w.

pentcho valev

Ask your masters:

http://quantum.leeds.ac.uk/~viv/FoP07abstracts/Butterfield.pdf
http://quantum.leeds.ac.uk/~sonwm/fop07/

Don't try to understand Master Butterfield's text; just learn it by
rote.

Pentcho Valev

h. wabnig

On 4 Apr 2007 01:15:06 -0700, "Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com>


Lissen, Pentcho, I said


Even an ape can type a text, a PDF, or a Pentcho Valev posting.

w.

pentcho valev

Master Jeremy Butterfield's text?!?! Something's going on in
Einstein's criminal cult.

Pentcho Valev

josefmatz

"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1175674506.906689.211040@l77g2000hsb.googlegr oups.com...

Obviously Einsteins concern was about instant spooky effects since they are
not compatible
in his original thoughts.

Instant spooky quantum effects are well approved in many labs and many
theories (quantum).
Even Richard Feynman said once: Light can go every velocity you just need to
hinder it go
normal allowed paths.

Nimtz (Uni cologne) , Haibel (now Max Planck institute berlin) and Wang (i
think NEC)
measured superluminal effects with superluminal signal transfer.

Haibels measurement at Uni cologne demonstrating FTL in the vacuum gap
between two
prisms in the case of frustated total reflection, a tunneling effect.
The explanation is macroscopic electrodynamics. Normal macroscopic
electrodynamics
can be used to explain the Nimtz (Haibels) experiments.

Now Relativity is not used in QM fully. The part used seems to be best
proven. But some
parts disagree with QM especially spooky effects. Furthermore it was not
only impossible
to integrate relativity and QM but also relativity and macroscopic
electrodynamics are
in clinch with each other since relativity is a pure vac*** theory not
pointing to the phenomena
for example in a simple glas block (light goes frequency dependent slower).

Now anomalous dispersion is one case where superluminal effects can ( this
means not must ! )
occur. Here already relativity is unable to integrate normal refraction and
of course also not
the superluminal cases. Now in the vacuum gap between two prisms
inhomogeneous waves
and their superposition are responsible for almost instant signal hopping in
the gap.
So the problem between relativity and QM is mainly the same as between
Macro - Electrodynamic
and Relativity. The theory of tunneling fluxes is nowhere developed in
literature that means
macroscopic electrodynamics is abandonened in literature where it becomes
FTL.
The teachers begin with maybe in universities since the strong theory
neglects all publishings
and anybody who says that he measured FTL was made mouth dead in the past,
its matter
or you measure wrong. FTL in vacuum now is dangerous to servere relativists.

Now i can tell you that macroscopic electrodynamics delivers FTL in
accordance with
experiments in vacuum. Now inhomogeneous waves in vacuum require an index
theory
for the surrounding matter (the two prisms). Without index or as i say it
with pure
microscopic theory no inhomogene waves and therefore no FTL exits. But
refraction index exists
and has usually a real and an imaginary part. Because it exists also
inhomgene waves exist
and therefore FTL even in vacuum and in accordance with experiments.

So a pure microscopic theory neglecting the existance of complex refraction
index can not deliver
FTL and is an inclompete theory. Pure vacuum physics where atoms are
embedded does not
decribe reality. FTL exists.

This does not mean that all relativity principles are wrong, but existance
of FTL is the end of GR
in the present form as i see it. And FTL is causal but not compatible with
SR - causality. So i think
the main point is that the true role of time is an other than viewed upon in
todays physics lectures
upon SRT. Time dilation must be explained by other principles working than
thought now.
So i think its on the turn to discuss relativity theories with of light at
least.

So there are indications that not only light can go FTL but also electrons
can tunnel FTL in
forbidden regions (diode gaps). If this is true the Schrödinger equation
does also deliver
such effects at step potentials in a rest frame. Then in fact FTL is a very
common solution
of wave equations with step index or step potentials. The only cause why not
discussed
in literature because of the relativistic postulate that such does not
exist.

So my opinion is that it would be fine if the relativists would not deny FTL
but rather would
open their eyes how relativity must be adjusted because one of its dogmas is
not fulfilled
in all experiments.

Struggle and fight and exchange of ideas on high niveau would be better than
just hinder such work.
The critics have the measurements on their side but in fact not the right
theories now.
The hard relativists are wrong per se. We should hope that these are dying
out.

Best regards

Josef Matz

Yes, cretins like you and Pancho are dying out. Of Alzheimer.

josefmatz

<karandash2000@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1175703763.115204.315340@w1g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...

Many of them already calmed down a little. If you are a radikal GR -
believer like the moderators
of sci.physics.research: The radikal muslims have also a wrong theory and do
not let count careful
other meanings. And since sci.physicis.research has defined FTL not to
exist, reasearchers who
work in this field can not even post anything nor can they point to errors
resulting from it.
In the picture of the radikal muslims this means terror and war.

Its undoubtedly wrong what you defend !

Hope you find the right view.

Josef Matz

He,he, he

rabid antirelativists like you and Pancho who ignore all experimental
evidence and keep repeating the same manthra are mirror images of the
radical muslims, I agree.