![]() |
sponsored links |
|
|
sponsored links
|
|
|
8
3rd February 11:16
External User
Posts: 1
|
In article <20030715102142.14767.00000425@mb-m07.aol.com>,
tjnawrocki@aol.compost says... Say, Tom, did the cameras follow the flight of the ball? |
|
|
9
3rd February 11:16
External User
Posts: 1
|
: In article <20030715102142.14767.00000425@mb-m07.aol.com>, : tjnawrocki@aol.compost says...
: >I hope whoever directed it is out of a job today. . . . the cameras : >didn't follow the flight of : >the ball. . . . AND THE CAMERAS DIDN'T FOLLOW THE : >FLIGHT OF THE BALL. . . . the camera didn't : >follow the flight of the ball. : >. . . . the cameras didn't follow the flight of the : >ball. At all. : >Unbelievable. . . . The : >camera didn't follow the flight of the ball. : Say, Tom, did the cameras follow the flight of the ball? I guess I didn't make myself clear, but the cameras didn't follow the flight of the ball. It's just so mind-bending that someone would televise a home-run derby in which the cameras didn't follow the flight of the ball, so I wanted to make sure I made that point clearly. Otherwise, no one would believe it. The cameras didn't follow the flight of the ball. Tom Nawrocki |
|