![]() |
sponsored links |
|
|
sponsored links
|
|
|
5
15th December 09:19
External User
Posts: 1
|
daflabear@webtv.net (DaFlaBear) writes:
That is entirely possible but do consider this. Stewart has been virtually indestructible throughout his career. If Chandler plays, it could well be because Stewart isn't doing the job. So now, Chandler goes down and you're **** Jauron. Do you put in the rookie or do you play Stewart even though he's already lost the job once and shown he can't do it? For you or I, this would be a tough decision. For Jauron, I'm convinced its no decision at all. He'll play the veteran just as he did last year with Leon Johnson. I think Stewart will have to go down or we won't see Grossman. But if that happens, yeah, we'll see allot of him, no doubt. I'm going to take the opportunity to say once again that I really don't like our QB situation with Chandler at all this year and I blame Angelo. Stewart might be Jauron's boy but with a rookie at #3 that they like don't want to see play, they need a little more than a "potato chip" at #2 and that's Angelo's decision. He's making himself look very bad. Tom S. -- Quote of the Day for Saturday, June 28, 2003 An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is an adventure wrongly considered. -- G. K. Chesterton |
|