Great as always, Mike! My comments interspersed below...
The guy is quietly making a believer out of many, including myself. The only
notable flaw I saw today was on his second sack, in which he eluded two
seperate rushes, and still refused to get rid of the ball. Still, no one's
perfect, but I disagreed with you on the assesment that he gets rid of the
ball when necessary. Rather, he rarely throws the ball away. So far though,
he's rarely had to, as he's usually had all the time in the world to throw.
On one of his pass rush escapes, he made a SWEET spin move to break free and
ran for good yardage.
He's finally had his road "cherry" popped. Let's see if he makes it two in a row next week.
Got the "Arlen" reference to King of the Hill (Boy I tell you, ha ha).
Sometimes, Martz actually looks smart for some of the guys he uncovers.
Today, Harris made everyone forget about his two special teams fumbles
earlier this year, and just worked his ASS off. His YPC were nothing
special, and Martz should've used Reynolds with 4 minutes to go in the 4th,
as Harris was CLEARLY gassed. Other than that, the kid deserved a game ball.
He seemed much more decisive on his choice of hitting gaps than both Faulk
AND Gordon today. MAybe the gaps were just bigger than the other two got?
Question... Where the hell are Curtis and McDonald? The Rams aren't using
any 4 and 5 receiver sets, and if they are, they aren't using either of
them. I'll comment on the Holt "pushing off" here, instead of below. He may
have done it once or twice, but NOWHERE NEAR as much as Bill Maas
insinuated, nor not more than any other premier receiver. Bottom line is,
top players get a little extra treatment, and Holt deserves it.
By the way, does Holt just catch EVERYTHING his way nowadays? I remember
earlier in his career, he obviously was talented, but occasionally fell
victim to the "dropsies". Now, anything near his hands gets ****ed in.
Dane Looker is a Looker, alright. Proehl was a fan favorite, and deservedly
so, but Looker may make everyone forget.
I remember reading a quote from the Saints GM in the first week saying that,
in the coming weeks he predicted the Rams OL would jell, and become the best
in the NFL. Not sure why he commented on it, or where I read it to be
honest, but found it to be a peculiar quote. I gotta say, at the time, even
*I* doubted it would happen. But damn if he wasn't right. This OL is even
better than any of the OL's the Rams have had during their 1999-current run.
Amazing work. I have always believed you are only as good as your OL, and if
that's the case, we're REAL good right now.
Any word on he injuries to Little/Lewis/Tinoisamoa?
Having Tinoisamoa go down with 1:30 left in a meaningless drive really
hurts. I hope it's not serious, because with Polley out too, I don't think
we can lose another starter at LB.
Losing Little, of course, would be a MAJOR blow as well.
Who is that guy in the #59 jersey? It SAYS "Duncan" on the back, but it
can't be JAMIE Duncan. *THIS* Duncan's actually playing some inspired football.
I nearly threw my shoe at the tv in regards to Butler's play today. He did
have some good moments, but overall, I think the jig is up. There is too
much game film out there exposing how weak he is, and I'm afraid a halfway
decent offensive team is going to just put his photo on their bulletin board
and they'll throw at, and PAST him, all day. His coverage on Hines' TD was
TERRIBLE! And on the attempted INT where the TE caught it (not the one he
tipped), he made no attempt to knock the ball away, and just expected that
the guy wouldn't get it, and he'd get it.
How many INT's have we lost this year, where the Rams DB had the ball in his
hands and just dropped it? Butler had one in the 1st quarter, where the ball
hit off the receivers hands right into his, and he just dropped it.
A welcome to Jason Sehorn to Rams Nation. He almost got an INT too, and
granted it was a tough play, but he could've had it as well. God I hope he
and Archuleta can play next week, because we MUST had Aeneas back at corner
ASAP!
Aeneas is proving each week that he's not only healthy, but is still a STUD.
A whole essay could be written on the Rams special teams inpeptness, but to
be honest, I have to work in the morning, and can't write about how bad it
is all day. But granted, I could.
This marks the 4th year in a row we simply haven't figured out special teams
as a whole. Not just parts of it, the WHOLE GODDAMN thing. At this point, I
would just assume that everyone on the other team on kicks and punts are
Dante Hall and just kick the ball out of bounds.
What's worse than our coverage is our returns. I have seen an increasing
strength in Martz's judgement as a coach, but am constantly befuddled by his
selections for kick and punt returns. Remember when it got bad for the Rams
in LA, they resorted to Henry Ellard as punt returner? He was their top
receiver, but still used him to return kicks. And there were times here when
it was so bad, they used Marshall Faulk. Well folks, its that bad again. I
KNOW we don't want to risk injury to a star player, but I honestly don't
know why they don't try Torry or Ike at PR; unless they have in practice and
they just can't do it.
Seriously.
Injury or not, punt returns are just as important as the offense, and we
simply can't be forced to drive 80-90 yards for every TD. In the playoffs,
teams don't LET you get 80-90 yards a drive, so special teams will hurt us
then. It's time for drastic measures.
On the flip side, I have seen the kick coverage improve, and Wilkins,
despite a miss today, has had an excellent year, both on FG and PAT, but as well on kickofs.
1. Time outs
2. Poor red zone play calling
3. Not getting Harris enough rest late
4. A little too MUCH trickery when the situation called for a simple play
5. Still not putting teams away
Other than that, Martz is clearly showing signs of growth as a head coach. I
have voiced my hatred for Martz more than once here, but know when to give
credit when its due; Martz is improving as a coach.
I was screaming at the face mask non-call too. Good thing we still got a TD on that.
Bill Maas is an idiot. He commented that Cam Cleeland was "coming into his
own" in the Rams system. While he has started to see the ball a little bit,
Cleeland has hardly been used this year. I can't remember what it was, but
he had some terribly bad pun joke that the play by play guy totally laid out
on him on.
He's a Madden wannabe, and he's terrible. He offers very little insight.
"Harris has a low center of gravity". DUH!
This is a more crucial game than many may admit. Should the Rams finish in a
tie for the division lead with SEA down the road, they MUST win as many, if
not all their divisional games, so as to ensure they take the division by
tiebreaker. Considering they play Seattle at HOME and play Arizona almost as
home, this is as close to a "must win" as the Rams have on their schedule
this year as they will have. SF will be akin to a wounded animal, and seem
to trade poor efforts with good ones. They're 3-1 at home, and despite a
shaky win over Detroit, and a loss to Cleveland, they still annihilated the
Bears in week one at home, and fairly well trounced the World Champs last
week. It'll be interesting to see which Niners show up. Hopefully the same
one that did today!
Final comment
Anyone else notice the Rams are still creeping in under everyone's radar?
Tom Jackson of ESPN still doesn't even have the Rams in his "Top Ten", and
listed the BENGALS as his "rising" team of the week. On ESPN's Sunday Night
game poll, they asked fans who the MVP so far was, and out of 6 players, not
a mention of Holt or Bulger, despite the fact Holt's #s are better than
Moss.
As far as I'm concerned, I'm glad they are still under the radar. I strongly
believe when you're on top, people do gun for you, and its an intangible
that gets widely overlooked. Next week though, I'm sure the Niners won't be
overlooking us. That may be the last time we'll be under the radar though
for the year, if we win.